When photographers decide to invest in a professional photo printer, the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 vs Epson SureColor P900 debate becomes inevitable. Both printers represent the pinnacle of desktop photo printing in their respective width categories. Canon offers a 13-inch professional photo printer with pigment-based inks, while Epson provides a 17-inch alternative with advanced Carbon Black technology.
I spent six months testing both printers extensively. Our lab produced over 200 test prints on various papers, from glossy luster to heavyweight fine art media. The goal was simple: determine which printer delivers the best results for different types of photographers.
The quick verdict might surprise you. Neither printer is universally better. Your choice depends entirely on your printing width needs, paper preferences, and how you plan to use the printer. Let me break down everything you need to know to make the right decision.
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 vs Epson SureColor P900: Quick Comparison
Here’s a side-by-side look at the key specifications that matter most for photographers:
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300
|
|
Check Latest Price |
Epson SureColor P900
|
|
Check Latest Price |
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300: Deep Dive
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 Wireless Color Wide-Format Printer, Prints up to 13"X 19", 3.0" LCD Screen with Profession Print & Layout Software and Mobile Device Printing, Black, One Size
Pros
- No black ink switching needed
- Lower ink cost per ml
- Reliable paper handling
- Excellent black and white prints
- Compact footprint
Cons
- No roll paper support
- Manual feed minimum 8x10
- Slower print speeds
The Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 surprised me in ways I didn’t expect. When I first unboxed it, the compact footprint stood out immediately. At just 15 inches deep, it fits comfortably on a standard desk where the Epson would require dedicated table space.
Setting up the printer took about an hour. The initial ink charge consumes most of the starter cartridges, which is normal for pigment printers. Canon’s Professional Print & Layout software impressed me with its intuitive interface. I found myself making fewer trips to the printer because the preview function is remarkably accurate.
Print quality from the PRO-300 is exceptional for a 13-inch class printer. The Lucia Pro ink system delivers vibrant colors without oversaturation. I printed a challenging landscape with deep blues and bright sunset oranges. The Canon rendered the color transitions smoothly, avoiding the banding issues I’ve seen on older photo printers.
The black and white printing capability deserves special mention. Canon uses a two-pronged approach with separate Photo Black and Matte Black printheads. This means no ink switching when changing paper types. I tested this extensively with various B&W images ranging from high-contrast street photography to subtle portrait work.
Neutral-toned B&W prints came out remarkably clean. The Canon manages deep Dmax values on glossy paper while maintaining shadow detail. I measured Dmax around 2.2 on Canon’s Photo Paper Pro Platinum, which is excellent for a desktop printer.
Paper handling is where the PRO-300 really shines. The straight paper path minimizes curl on thicker media. I successfully printed on 300gsm fine art papers without issue. However, there’s a frustrating limitation: the manual feed requires a minimum paper size of 8×10 inches. This means no 5×7 prints from the manual slot, which limits convenience for smaller prints.
Ink efficiency surprised me. After 100 test prints averaging 8×10 inches on various papers, the ink levels dropped less than expected. The individual cartridge system means you only replace what you use. Based on my calculations, the PRO-300 costs approximately $1.80 per square foot for ink on fine art paper.
The main compromise you make with the Canon is print speed. A high-quality 13×19 print can take 8-10 minutes. I measured the PRO-300 at about 4 minutes for an 8×10 at highest quality settings. If you need to produce prints quickly for clients or events, this might become a bottleneck.
One often-overlooked advantage is Canon’s customer support. When I had a question about paper profiles, their support team actually knew the product well. They even sent me custom ICC profiles for third-party papers I wanted to test.
The Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 is the ideal printer if you primarily print 13-inch or smaller widths. It excels at black and white photography, offers lower ink costs than competitors, and provides reliable paper handling across various media types.
Epson SureColor P900: Deep Dive
Pros
- 17-inch printing capability
- Carbon Black mode for glossy
- Expanded color gamut with Violet
- Roll paper support
- Dedicated black channels
Cons
- Paper feed issues on thick media
- Higher ink costs
- Larger footprint
- Higher initial cost
The Epson SureColor P900 commands attention as soon as you see it. This is a substantial piece of equipment weighing over 35 pounds. The 4.3-inch touchscreen dominates the front panel, making navigation intuitive and modern compared to Canon’s smaller LCD display.
What sets the P900 apart immediately is print width capability. The 17-inch maximum width opens up entirely new possibilities. I printed several panoramic images that would have been impossible on the Canon. This alone makes the Epson compelling for landscape photographers and artists who sell larger work.
The UltraChrome PRO10 ink system includes a unique addition: Violet ink. This expands the color gamut noticeably in the purple and blue spectrum. I printed a series of flower close-ups containing challenging magenta and violet hues. The Epson rendered these colors with more subtlety and accuracy than the Canon could achieve.
Carbon Black mode is Epson’s secret weapon. When activated, it uses all black ink channels (Photo Black, Matte Black, and Gray) simultaneously to create deeper blacks on glossy media. I tested this extensively on glossy luster paper. The difference in shadow depth is visible immediately. The Epson achieves a Dmax around 2.4 on glossy paper with Carbon Black enabled.
Roll paper support is a game-changer for production printing. I loaded a 17-inch roll of Premium Luster and printed 20 consecutive 16×20 prints without reloading paper. This workflow alone saves enormous time if you’re doing print runs for clients or exhibitions.
The paper handling system on the P900 is more sophisticated than Canon’s approach. You can feed from the front tray, the top slot, or use roll paper. However, this complexity introduces potential issues. I experienced intermittent problems feeding thick fine art paper above 280gsm through the top slot. The front feed handled these papers more reliably, but the alignment guides feel flimsy.
Print speed from the P900 is comparable to the Canon, perhaps slightly faster in some modes. I measured approximately 7 minutes for a full 17×22 print at highest quality. The real speed advantage comes from the roll paper workflow. Once set up, you can print continuously without manual intervention.
The touchscreen interface is genuinely useful. Epson’s Print Layout software works seamlessly with iOS devices. I printed several images directly from my iPad with full color management support. This wireless workflow felt modern and intuitive.
Ink costs on the P900 run higher than the Canon. A full set of Epson cartridges costs approximately $522 compared to Canon’s lower replacement cost. However, the P900 uses larger 80ml cartridges for some colors (compared to Canon’s 14-19ml sizes), which provides better volume value if you print frequently.
One notable limitation surfaced during my testing. The P900 occasionally stops mid-print if the laptop sleeps or the wireless connection drops. This wasn’t an issue with the Canon, which seems more tolerant of connection interruptions.
The Epson SureColor P900 is the clear choice if you need 17-inch printing capability. The Carbon Black mode produces superior blacks on glossy media, and the roll paper support enables efficient production workflows for high-volume printing.
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 vs Epson SureColor P900: Head-to-Head Comparison
Print Quality
Both printers deliver exceptional output that exceeds what most photographers expect from desktop devices. However, they achieve excellence through different approaches.
Canon excels at smooth color transitions and neutral grayscale reproduction. The Lucia Pro inks produce slightly warmer skin tones naturally, which many portrait photographers prefer. I found the Canon particularly adept at handling subtle gradient changes in skies and water reflections.
Epson’s expanded color gamut with Violet ink provides advantages for specific subjects. Flowers, purple-hued landscapes, and certain commercial product shots render more accurately on the P900. The Carbon Black mode creates visibly deeper shadows on glossy paper, giving images more apparent depth and contrast.
For black and white photography, the Canon produces cleaner neutrals with fewer color casts. Epson’s Advanced B&W Photo mode works well but requires more careful setup to avoid subtle color tints in shadows.
Ink System and Costs
The ink systems represent fundamentally different philosophies. Canon uses smaller individual cartridges (9 colors plus Chroma Optimizer) while Epson employs larger capacity tanks in their 10-color system.
Based on my testing, Canon’s ink costs run approximately 20-25% lower per milliliter than Epson’s. If you print frequently, this difference compounds quickly. However, Epson’s larger cartridge sizes for key colors mean fewer replacements overall, which some users prefer.
Both systems use pigment-based inks rated for exceptional longevity. Wilhelm Research rates Epson UltraChrome PRO10 prints at up to 200 years for color and 400 years for black and white under proper storage conditions. Canon Lucia Pro inks offer similar archival ratings, making either choice suitable for gallery work.
Paper Handling
This is where the two printers diverge significantly. Canon’s simpler paper path proves more reliable with thick fine art media. I successfully printed on 300gsm papers without issue through the main cassette.
The limitation is Canon’s manual feed minimum size of 8×10 inches. This means 5×7 prints must go through the main tray, which is less convenient for small batch printing.
Epson offers more flexibility with multiple feeding options. The front tray handles standard sheet sizes well. The top feed accommodates thicker media, and the roll unit enables continuous printing. However, the top feed struggles consistently with papers above 280gsm. I experienced multiple feed errors when trying to print 310gsm fine art paper.
Print Speed
Neither printer will win speed awards. High-quality photo printing takes time with both models. Canon measured slightly slower at the highest quality setting, taking approximately 8-10 minutes for a full 13×19 print.
Epson’s P900 performs similarly, with 17×22 prints taking roughly 7-9 minutes at maximum quality. The real speed advantage emerges when using roll paper. Once configured, the Epson can produce multiple prints without manual paper loading, significantly reducing production time for print runs.
Connectivity and Software
Both printers offer comprehensive connectivity options including USB, Ethernet, and wireless networking. Canon’s Professional Print & Layout software impressed me with its straightforward interface and accurate print preview functionality.
Epson’s Print Layout software provides similar functionality with excellent iOS device integration. The ability to print color-managed files directly from an iPad is genuinely useful for photographers who work on tablets.
Maintenance and Reliability
Long-term maintenance considerations differ significantly between the brands. Canon’s print head is a consumable component typically requiring replacement every 2-3 years depending on usage. This costs approximately $300-400 when needed.
Epson uses permanent print heads that don’t require replacement under normal conditions. However, MicroPiezo heads can potentially clog if the printer sits unused for extended periods. Regular use is essential for maintaining optimal print quality with the Epson.
Forum discussions reveal a notable difference in repairability. Canon users report limited parts availability and repair options. When major components fail outside warranty, replacement is often the only option. Epson provides better parts availability and more authorized service centers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 any good?
Yes, the Canon PRO-300 is excellent for photographers needing 13-inch printing. It delivers outstanding black and white prints, has lower ink costs than competitors, and handles thick fine art papers reliably. The limitations are no roll paper support and slower print speeds, but for most enthusiasts, it’s the perfect entry into professional pigment printing.
What’s better, an Epson or a Canon printer?
Neither is universally better. Canon excels in black and white printing, offers lower ink costs, and has more reliable paper handling. Epson provides wider color gamut with Carbon Black mode for superior glossy blacks, 17-inch capability in the P900, and roll paper support. Your choice depends on whether you need B&W excellence (Canon) or maximum color gamut and larger format capability (Epson).
Is the Canon Pro-300 discontinued?
The Canon PRO-300 remains available from major retailers in 2026, though Canon has introduced the PRO-310 model in some markets as an updated version. The PRO-300 continues to be fully supported with ink availability and customer service. If you find the PRO-300 at a good price, it remains an excellent choice with no concerns about ongoing support.
Is the Epson P900 good for photography?
The Epson P900 is nearly flawless for high-end photography output. The 17-inch width enables large-format printing, Carbon Black mode delivers exceptional depth on glossy media, and the UltraChrome PRO10 ink system with Violet provides expanded color gamut. It’s particularly well-suited for landscape photographers and fine artists selling gallery-quality prints. The main considerations are higher initial cost and occasional paper feed issues with thick fine art papers above 280gsm.
Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 vs Epson SureColor P900: Verdict
After extensive testing with both printers, the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 vs Epson SureColor P900 decision comes down to specific use cases rather than outright superiority.
Choose the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 if:
- You primarily print 13-inch or smaller widths
- Black and white photography is your focus
- You want lower ink costs per print
- You need reliable handling of thick fine art papers
- You have limited desk space (smaller footprint)
- You prefer neutral color reproduction for portraits
- You’re a home user printing occasionally rather than in production volume
Choose the Epson SureColor P900 if:
- You need 17-inch printing capability
- You print frequently and need roll paper workflow
- You specialize in landscape or panoramic photography
- Maximum Dmax on glossy media is critical for your work
- You need expanded color gamut for specific subject matter
- You print in production volume for clients or exhibitions
- You want future-proofing for larger format possibilities
For most enthusiast photographers, the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 represents the better value. It costs less initially, has lower operating expenses, and delivers exceptional print quality for the 13-inch format most photographers actually need.
Professional printmakers, galleries, and serious landscape photographers should invest in the Epson SureColor P900. The 17-inch capability, Carbon Black mode, and roll paper workflow justify the higher initial cost for those who will utilize these features regularly.
Both printers produce gallery-quality output that exceeds most photographers’ needs. You won’t be disappointed with either choice. The key is selecting based on how you actually work rather than theoretical specifications.