I’ve been shooting with 35mm lenses for over a decade, and let me tell you – the battle between Tamron’s SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD and Sigma’s 35mm f/1.4 Art is one of the most hotly debated topics in photography circles today. When Tamron released their first f/1.4 prime lens, the photography world held its breath. Could this newcomer challenge Sigma’s reigning champion?
I’ve spent countless hours testing both lenses in real-world scenarios – from wedding photography to landscape shots, from portraits to street photography. I’ve pixel-peeped, compared charts, and most importantly, taken thousands of actual photographs with both lenses. And I’m here to share everything I’ve discovered.
The 35mm focal length is magical. It’s wide enough for environmental portraits yet tight enough for intimate shots. It’s perfect for street photography, landscapes, and everything in between. But which of these two incredible lenses deserves a place in your camera bag?
Let me break down every aspect you need to know to make an informed decision. Trust me, by the end of this article, you’ll know exactly which lens is right for your specific needs and budget.
Quick Specs Comparison: The Numbers Game
Before we dive deep into the real-world performance, let’s get the technical specifications out of the way. I know some of you love the hard numbers, and I don’t blame you – they tell an important part of the story.
Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Specifications:
- Focal Length: 35mm
- Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
- Minimum Aperture: f/16
- Optical Construction: 14 elements in 10 groups (3 aspherical, 4 LD elements)
- Coating: BBAR-G2 (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection Generation 2)
- Autofocus: USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive) with Dynamic Rolling-Cam Mechanism
- Weather Sealing: Yes, moisture-resistant construction
- Filter Size: 72mm
- Weight: 815g (28.7 oz)
- Dimensions: 104 x 81mm
- Closest Focusing Distance: 0.3m (11.8″)
- Maximum Magnification: 0.2x
- Price: Around $899
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Specifications:
- Focal Length: 35mm
- Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
- Minimum Aperture: f/16
- Optical Construction: 13 elements in 11 groups
- Coating: Super Multi-Layer Coating
- Autofocus: HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor)
- Weather Sealing: No
- Filter Size: 67mm
- Weight: 665g (23.5 oz)
- Dimensions: 94 x 77mm
- Closest Focusing Distance: 0.3m (11.8″)
- Maximum Magnification: 0.19x
- Price: Around $899
Key Differences at a Glance:
- Weight: Sigma is 150g lighter
- Weather Sealing: Tamron wins here
- Filter Size: Tamron uses 72mm, Sigma uses 67mm
- Optical Design: Tamron has more complex optical construction
- Coating Technology: Tamron’s newer BBAR-G2 vs Sigma’s SML
- Magnification: Tamron slightly better (0.2x vs 0.19x)
Build Quality and Ergonomics: Which Feels Better in Hand?
I’ll be honest – when I first picked up the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4, I was surprised by its weight. At 815g, it’s noticeably heavier than the Sigma at 665g. But here’s the thing: that extra weight translates to a substantial, premium feel that I’ve come to appreciate during long shooting sessions.
Tamron Build Quality:
The Tamron feels like a tank in the best possible way. The satin black finish with the distinctive gold SP ring screams professional. I’ve shot with this lens in light rain and dusty conditions, and the weather sealing has never let me down. The focus ring is buttery smooth with just the right amount of resistance, and the autofocus switch has a satisfying click.
One feature I absolutely love is the locking lens hood with the push-button release. It might seem like a small thing, but when you’re fumbling with gear in the dark during a wedding reception, that secure lock gives you peace of mind.
Sigma Build Quality:
Sigma’s Art series has always been known for excellent build quality, and the 35mm f/1.4 is no exception. It’s lighter than the Tamron, which some photographers prefer for handheld shooting. The metal mount is robust, and the overall construction feels solid.
However, the lack of weather sealing is a noticeable omission in 2025. I’ve been caught in unexpected light rain with this lens, and while it survived, I was definitely more nervous than I would have been with the Tamron.
Real-World Handling:
After shooting with both lenses extensively, I’ve discovered that the Tamron’s extra weight actually helps with stability, especially when shooting at slower shutter speeds. The Sigma’s lighter weight makes it more suitable for all-day handheld shooting, particularly for street photography where you’re constantly on the move.
The Tamron’s focus ring is slightly wider and more textured, making manual focus adjustments easier in low light. Both lenses have full-time manual focus override, which is essential for my shooting style.
Also Read: Ronin SC2 vs Weebill S
Optical Performance: Sharpness Showdown
This is where things get really interesting. I’ve tested both lenses on multiple camera bodies, from high-megapixel DSLRs to modern mirrorless cameras with adapters, and the results might surprise you.
Center Sharpness:
At f/1.4, both lenses are impressively sharp in the center. But here’s the kicker – the Tamron maintains its sharpness across a much larger portion of the frame. I discovered this when shooting portraits wide open. With the Sigma, I need to be more precise with my focus point to ensure the eyes are tack-sharp. With the Tamron, I have more flexibility.
What really blew me away was when I compared the Tamron at f/1.4 to the Sigma at f/2.8. Believe it or not, the Tamron wide open is roughly equal to or even slightly better than the Sigma stopped down to f/2.8. I ran this test three times because I couldn’t believe my eyes!
Corner Sharpness:
This is where the Tamron really pulls ahead. While the Sigma shows noticeable softness in the corners at f/1.4, the Tamron maintains remarkable sharpness edge-to-edge. I’ve shot landscapes with both lenses, and the difference is visible even without pixel-peeping.
The Tamron also exhibits better field curvature control, meaning when you focus on a flat subject (like a brick wall), the entire plane stays sharp. The Sigma shows some field curvature, which can be problematic for architectural photography.
Stopped-Down Performance:
By f/2.8, both lenses are performing exceptionally well, and by f/4, they’re both razor-sharp across the frame. However, the Tamron maintains its slight edge in the corners even when stopped down.
Real-World Sharpness Examples:
I shot a wedding with both lenses, switching between them during the reception. The Tamron consistently delivered sharper images in challenging lighting conditions, particularly when shooting wide open. The Sigma performed admirably, but I found myself stopping down to f/2 more often to ensure critical sharpness.
Bokeh and Background Rendering: The Artistic Difference
Sharpness isn’t everything – the way a lens renders out-of-focus areas (bokeh) can make or break a portrait. Both lenses have their own unique character here.
Tamron Bokeh Characteristics:
The Tamron produces beautiful, creamy bokeh with 9 rounded aperture blades. The transition from in-focus to out-of-focus areas is smooth and natural. I’ve found that the bokeh balls are perfectly round when shot wide open, with minimal cat’s eye effect in the corners.
One thing I absolutely love about the Tamron is how it handles specular highlights. The bokeh has a gentle, dreamy quality that’s perfect for portraits. I’ve shot numerous senior portraits and engagement sessions with this lens, and clients consistently comment on the “professional look” of the images.
Sigma Bokeh Characteristics:
The Sigma’s bokeh is also excellent, with a slightly different character. Some photographers describe it as having more “pop” or contrast in the out-of-focus areas. The bokeh balls are round and well-defined, though they can show some cat’s eye effect in the corners at wider apertures.
The Sigma has been a favorite among portrait photographers for years, and for good reason. The background separation is excellent, and the bokeh has a smooth, pleasing quality that works well for most portrait situations.
Which Bokeh is Better?
This is subjective, but I personally prefer the Tamron’s bokeh for most situations. It’s slightly smoother and more natural-looking, particularly when shooting against busy backgrounds. However, if you prefer a more contrasty, defined look to your backgrounds, the Sigma might be more to your taste.
Autofocus Performance: Speed and Accuracy
In today’s fast-paced photography world, autofocus performance can make or break a shot. I’ve tested both lenses extensively in various shooting conditions.
Tamron Autofocus:
The Tamron’s USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive) with Dynamic Rolling-Cam Mechanism is impressive. It’s fast, quiet, and most importantly, accurate. I’ve shot everything from fast-moving toddlers to low-light wedding receptions, and the autofocus rarely misses.
What I really appreciate is how the Tamron handles low-light situations. It hunts less than expected and locks onto subjects quickly. The autofocus is also virtually silent, making it perfect for video work and quiet environments like ceremonies.
Sigma Autofocus:
The Sigma’s HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor) has been proven over years of use. It’s fast and reliable, though slightly noisier than the Tamron. In good light, it’s exceptionally quick and accurate.
However, I’ve noticed that the Sigma can hunt more in low-light situations compared to the Tamron. It’s not a deal-breaker, but it’s something to be aware of if you frequently shoot in challenging lighting conditions.
Real-World Autofocus Testing:
I shot a dance recital with both lenses, switching between them during different performances. The Tamron consistently tracked moving subjects better, particularly in the dim lighting of the venue. The Sigma performed well but required slightly more attention to ensure focus accuracy.
Vignetting, Distortion, and Chromatic Aberration
These technical aspects might not be as exciting as sharpness or bokeh, but they significantly impact your final image quality and post-processing workflow.
Vignetting:
Both lenses show noticeable vignetting at f/1.4, which is typical for fast primes. The Tamron’s vignetting is slightly more pronounced but has a more gradual, natural falloff that many photographers find pleasing.
By f/2.8, vignetting is well-controlled on both lenses, and by f/4, it’s virtually gone. The good news is that both lenses have correction profiles available in Lightroom and other post-processing software, making vignetting correction a simple one-click process.
Distortion:
This is where both lenses excel. I was pleasantly surprised by how well-controlled distortion is on both optics. The Tamron shows minimal barrel distortion, while the Sigma has virtually none.
For architectural photography, both lenses perform admirably. I’ve shot numerous building interiors with both, and the straight lines remain straight with minimal correction needed in post-processing.
Chromatic Aberration:
Chromatic aberration (CA) is the enemy of sharp, clean images, especially when shooting high-contrast scenes. Both lenses control CA well, but the Tamron has a slight edge here.
The Tamron’s BBAR-G2 coating and advanced optical design result in minimal lateral and longitudinal CA, even when shooting wide open. The Sigma shows slightly more CA, particularly longitudinal CA (purple fringing) in high-contrast situations.
In real-world shooting, I’ve found that the Tamron requires less CA correction in post-processing, which saves time during my editing workflow.
Low-Light Performance: Pushing the Limits
As a photographer who frequently shoots in challenging lighting conditions – from dark wedding venues to astrophotography sessions – low-light performance is crucial to me.
Tamron Low-Light Performance:
The Tamron’s combination of wide f/1.4 aperture and excellent sharpness wide open makes it a stellar low-light performer. I’ve shot handheld at ridiculously slow shutter speeds and still gotten sharp images.
What really impressed me was how well the Tamron handles point light sources at night. Street lamps, stars, and city lights remain sharp and well-defined with minimal coma or astigmatism. This makes it an excellent choice for astrophotography and night cityscapes.
Sigma Low-Light Performance:
The Sigma is also a capable low-light performer, though it doesn’t quite match the Tamron’s wide-open performance. I’ve found that I often need to stop down to f/2 or f/2.8 to get the same level of sharpness that the Tamron delivers at f/1.4.
However, the Sigma’s lighter weight can be an advantage for handheld low-light shooting, as it’s easier to keep steady for longer periods.
Real-World Low-Light Examples:
I shot a series of night street photography images with both lenses. The Tamron consistently delivered sharper images at f/1.4, with better control of coma and astigmatism around bright light sources. The Sigma performed well but required slightly higher ISO settings or slower shutter speeds to achieve similar results.
Also Read: Pelican IM2500 vs 1510
Color Rendition and Contrast
Every lens has its own “color signature” – the way it renders colors and contrast. This can significantly impact the look and feel of your images.
Tamron Color Rendition:
The Tamron produces vibrant, punchy colors with excellent contrast straight out of camera. I’ve found that the colors are neutral and accurate, with no noticeable color cast. This makes it excellent for portrait photography, as skin tones look natural and flattering.
The contrast is excellent without being harsh, giving images a three-dimensional quality that really makes subjects pop from the background.
Sigma Color Rendition:
The Sigma has a slightly warmer color signature that many photographers love. It produces rich, saturated colors that can look particularly appealing for landscape and nature photography.
The contrast is slightly higher than the Tamron, which can be either an advantage or disadvantage depending on your shooting style and subject matter.
Which Color Signature is Better?
Again, this is subjective and depends on your personal preference and shooting style. I personally prefer the Tamron’s more neutral color rendition for portrait work, as it gives me more flexibility in post-processing. However, for landscape photography, I sometimes prefer the Sigma’s warmer, more saturated look.
Value for Money: Which Lens Offers More Bang for Your Buck?
Both lenses retail for around $899, making them direct competitors in terms of price. But which one offers better value for your hard-earned money?
Tamron Value Proposition:
The Tamron offers several advantages that make it an excellent value:
- Superior optical performance, especially wide open
- Weather sealing for protection against the elements
- More advanced optical design and coating technology
- Better corner-to-corner sharpness
- Excellent low-light performance
When you consider that the Tamron matches or exceeds the performance of lenses costing twice as much (like Canon and Nikon’s native 35mm f/1.4 options), it’s an incredible value.
Sigma Value Proposition:
The Sigma has been a proven performer for years and offers:
- Lighter weight for better handheld handling
- Slightly warmer color rendition that many photographers prefer
- Proven reliability and track record
- Excellent build quality (despite lack of weather sealing)
While it doesn’t quite match the Tamron’s optical performance, it’s still an excellent lens that has served countless photographers well.
Long-Term Value:
Considering the Tamron’s more recent release and advanced features, I believe it offers better long-term value. The weather sealing alone could save you from costly repairs if you get caught in bad weather. Additionally, the superior optical performance means you’re less likely to feel the need to upgrade in the future.
Who Should Buy the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD?
Based on my extensive testing, I recommend the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD for:
Professional Photographers:
If you shoot weddings, portraits, or events professionally, the Tamron’s combination of excellent sharpness, weather sealing, and reliable autofocus makes it the better choice. I’ve shot numerous paid gigs with this lens, and it has never let me down.
Landscape and Architecture Photographers:
The superior corner-to-corner sharpness and minimal distortion make the Tamron ideal for landscape and architectural work. I’ve been consistently impressed with how well it handles detailed scenes and straight lines.
Low-Light Enthusiasts:
If you frequently shoot in challenging lighting conditions – from night photography to indoor events – the Tamron’s excellent wide-open performance gives you a significant advantage.
Photographers Who Value Weather Sealing:
If you shoot outdoors in variable conditions, the Tamron’s weather sealing provides peace of mind that the Sigma simply can’t match.
Pixel Peepers and Technical Perfectionists:
If you demand the absolute best optical performance and love to examine your images at 100%, the Tamron’s superior sharpness and aberration control will make you happy.
Who Should Buy the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art?
Despite the Tamron’s advantages, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art is still an excellent choice for certain photographers:
Street Photographers:
The Sigma’s lighter weight makes it more suitable for all-day street photography where you’re constantly moving and shooting handheld.
Photographers on a Budget:
While both lenses are similarly priced new, you can often find used Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lenses for significantly less than the Tamron, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Sigma Art Series Fans:
If you already own and love other Sigma Art lenses, the 35mm f/1.4 will provide consistent color rendition and handling across your lens collection.
Videographers:
The Sigma’s slightly warmer color rendition and lighter weight can be advantages for video work, particularly when shooting handheld or on gimbals.
Portrait Photographers Who Prefer Warmer Tones:
If you love the rich, warm colors that Sigma lenses are known for, the 35mm f/1.4 Art will deliver that signature look straight out of camera.
Real-World Shooting Scenarios: Which Lens Excels Where?
I’ve tested both lenses in numerous real-world shooting scenarios. Here’s how they compare:
Wedding Photography:
Winner: Tamron The Tamron’s superior autofocus performance in low light, weather sealing, and excellent wide-open sharpness make it the clear winner for wedding photography. I’ve shot entire weddings with this lens and been consistently impressed with its performance.
Portrait Photography:
Winner: Tamron (slightly) While both lenses are excellent for portraits, the Tamron’s sharper wide-open performance and smoother bokeh give it a slight edge. However, if you prefer the Sigma’s warmer color rendition, you might prefer it for skin tones.
Landscape Photography:
Winner: Tamron The Tamron’s superior corner sharpness and minimal distortion make it the better choice for landscape photography. I’ve been consistently impressed with how well it handles detailed scenic shots.
Street Photography:
Winner: Sigma The Sigma’s lighter weight makes it more suitable for the quick, handheld shooting typical of street photography. It’s less fatiguing to carry and shoot with all day.
Astrophotography:
Winner: Tamron The Tamron’s excellent control of coma and astigmatism, combined with its superior wide-open sharpness, make it the better choice for astrophotography. I’ve shot numerous night sky images with this lens and been amazed at the results.
Event Photography:
Winner: Tamron Similar to wedding photography, the Tamron’s low-light performance and reliable autofocus make it the better choice for event photography in challenging lighting conditions.
Sample Images and Real-World Examples
Words can only tell you so much. Let me share some specific examples from my shooting experiences with both lenses:
Portrait Example:
I shot a series of headshots with both lenses under identical lighting conditions. The Tamron images showed noticeably better eye sharpness at f/1.4, with smoother skin texture rendering. The Sigma images were excellent but required slightly more sharpening in post-processing to achieve the same level of detail.
Landscape Example:
During a sunrise landscape shoot, I captured identical scenes with both lenses. The Tamron image showed better detail in the corners, particularly in distant tree lines and rock formations. The Sigma image was excellent but showed slight softening in the extreme corners.
Low-Light Example:
I shot a dimly lit restaurant interior with both lenses. The Tamron captured the scene at f/1.4, ISO 3200, with excellent sharpness throughout. The Sigma required f/2.0, ISO 3200 to achieve similar sharpness, resulting in slightly less background separation.
Action Example:
I photographed a children’s soccer game with both lenses. The Tamron’s autofocus tracked the moving players more consistently, particularly when they were moving toward or away from the camera. The Sigma performed well but had slightly more missed focus instances.
Long-Term Reliability and Durability
Having used both lenses extensively over the past year, I can share some insights into their long-term reliability:
Tamron Long-Term Performance:
The Tamron has held up exceptionally well to heavy use. I’ve shot in rain, dust, and extreme temperatures, and it continues to perform flawlessly. The weather sealing has proven effective, and the autofocus remains as quick and accurate as when it was new.
One concern I initially had was the complexity of the optical design – more elements mean more potential points of failure. However, after a year of heavy use, I’ve experienced no issues whatsoever.
Sigma Long-Term Performance:
The Sigma has a proven track record of reliability over many years. Many photographers have used their Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lenses for years without issues. The simpler optical design may contribute to its long-term reliability.
However, the lack of weather sealing means you need to be more careful about environmental conditions. I’ve heard from photographers who have experienced dust ingress issues with their Sigma lenses over time.
Firmware Updates and Future-Proofing
In today’s rapidly evolving photography world, firmware updates and future compatibility are important considerations:
Tamron Firmware Support:
Tamron has been excellent about providing firmware updates for their lenses. They offer a USB dock that allows you to update lens firmware and fine-tune autofocus performance. This is crucial for maintaining compatibility with new camera bodies.
I’ve updated my Tamron’s firmware twice, and each update has improved autofocus performance and compatibility. This level of support suggests that Tamron is committed to keeping their lenses current and compatible.
Sigma Firmware Support:
Sigma also offers excellent firmware support through their USB dock. The Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art has received numerous firmware updates over the years, improving autofocus performance and compatibility.
However, as an older design, it’s unclear how much longer Sigma will continue to provide firmware updates for this lens. This could become a concern if you plan to use it with future camera bodies.
Final Verdict: Which Lens Should You Buy?
After months of testing and real-world shooting with both lenses, I can confidently say that the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD is the better choice for most photographers in 2025.
Here’s why:
- Superior Optical Performance: The Tamron is sharper wide open, has better corner-to-corner sharpness, and controls aberrations better than the Sigma.
- Weather Sealing: This alone makes the Tamron worth the investment for photographers who shoot outdoors.
- Better Low-Light Performance: The Tamron’s excellent wide-open performance gives you a significant advantage in challenging lighting conditions.
- More Advanced Design: The Tamron’s newer optical design and coating technology make it more future-proof.
- Excellent Value: At the same price point as the Sigma, the Tamron offers more features and better performance.
However, the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art is still an excellent lens that might be better suited for:
- Street photographers who prioritize lightweight handling
- Photographers on a budget who can find good used copies
- Those who prefer Sigma’s warmer color rendition
- Videographers who need lighter weight for gimbal work
My Personal Choice:
If I could only keep one of these lenses, I would choose the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD without hesitation. Its combination of excellent optical performance, weather sealing, and reliable autofocus makes it the more versatile and capable lens for the type of photography I do.
I’ve used it for everything from professional weddings to personal landscape photography, and it has never disappointed me. The peace of mind that comes with weather sealing alone is worth the investment, especially when you’re shooting paid gigs where equipment failure is not an option.
Pro Photography Tips for Getting the Most from Your 35mm Lens
Regardless of which lens you choose, here are some pro tips I’ve discovered for getting the most out of your 35mm prime:
1. Master the Focal Length:
35mm is versatile but requires practice to master. Spend time shooting with nothing but your 35mm lens to truly understand its perspective and capabilities.
2. Use the Aperture Creatively:
Don’t just shoot wide open because you can. Experiment with different apertures to balance sharpness, depth of field, and background separation for each scene.
3. Get Close for Impact:
35mm lenses shine when you get close to your subject. Don’t be afraid to fill the frame and create intimate, impactful images.
4. Watch Your Composition:
The wider field of view means you need to be more conscious of background elements. Use the environment to enhance your subject rather than distract from it.
5. Embrace the Versatility:
Try different genres with your 35mm – portraits, landscapes, street photography, events. You’ll be amazed at how capable this focal length is for almost any situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 weather sealed?
Yes, the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD features moisture-resistant construction with rubber gaskets at the mount and other critical points. This makes it suitable for shooting in light rain and dusty conditions, though it’s not fully waterproof.
Which lens is better for portraits, Tamron or Sigma 35mm?
While both lenses are excellent for portraits, I personally prefer the Tamron for its superior wide-open sharpness and smoother bokeh rendering. However, if you prefer warmer skin tones straight out of camera, the Sigma might be more to your liking.
Can I use these lenses on mirrorless cameras?
Yes, both lenses can be used on mirrorless cameras with the appropriate adapter. I’ve tested both on Sony and Nikon mirrorless systems with excellent results. However, autofocus performance may vary depending on the adapter quality.
Which lens has better autofocus performance?
In my testing, the Tamron has slightly better autofocus performance, particularly in low-light situations. Its USD motor with Dynamic Rolling-Cam Mechanism is fast, quiet, and accurate.
Are these lenses good for video?
Both lenses can produce excellent video results. The Tamron’s silent autofocus makes it better for situations where you need quiet operation, while the Sigma’s lighter weight makes it better for handheld and gimbal work.
How do these lenses compare to native Canon/Nikon 35mm f/1.4 options?
Both the Tamron and Sigma offer performance that rivals or exceeds native Canon and Nikon 35mm f/1.4 lenses, often at half the price. The Tamron, in particular, has been shown to outperform the Canon 35mm f/1.4L II in sharpness tests.
Which lens is better for astrophotography?
The Tamron is the better choice for astrophotography due to its superior control of coma and astigmatism, combined with excellent wide-open sharpness. Stars remain point-like across the frame, even in the corners.
Do I need to fine-tune autofocus with these lenses?
Both lenses can benefit from autofocus fine-tuning, particularly if you’re using them with high-megapixel bodies. The Tamron and Sigma both offer USB docks for precise autofocus calibration.
Save This Article for Future Reference
Photography gear decisions are important, and I want you to have this information handy when you’re ready to make your purchase. Be sure to bookmark this article or save it to your photography resources folder.
I’ll be updating this comparison regularly as new firmware updates become available and as I continue to test both lenses in real-world shooting scenarios. Photography technology evolves quickly, and I want to make sure you always have the most current, accurate information.
Final Thought: Both the Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD and Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art are excellent lenses that will serve you well for years to come. You can’t go wrong with either choice, but based on my extensive testing, the Tamron offers better performance, more features, and greater value for most photographers in 2025.
Happy shooting, and I hope this comparison helps you make the best choice for your photography journey!