When it comes to ultra-wide-angle lenses for Nikon’s DX (APS-C) format cameras, two options stand out in the company’s lineup: the Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX and the Nikon 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR AF-P DX. As a professional landscape and architectural photographer who has spent countless hours shooting with both lenses, I can tell you that choosing between these two optics isn’t just about price—it’s about finding the right tool that matches your specific creative vision and shooting style. The Nikon 10-24mm vs Nikon 10-20mm debate has become increasingly relevant as more photographers seek to expand their creative possibilities with wide-angle perspectives.
In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll break down every aspect of these lenses based on my personal experience in real-world shooting scenarios. Whether you’re a landscape photographer, architecture enthusiast, or travel blogger looking to capture expansive scenes, this guide will help you make an informed decision about which of these wide-angle wonders deserves a place in your camera bag.
A Tale of Two Wide-Angle Contenders
Before diving into the details, let me give you a quick overview of these lenses. The Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G, released in 2009, has been Nikon’s premium ultra-wide-angle zoom for DX format cameras for over a decade. The Nikon 10-20mm f/4.5-5.6G VR, introduced in 2017, represents Nikon’s newer, more budget-friendly approach to the ultra-wide category, with the added benefit of Vibration Reduction (VR) technology.
I remember when the 10-20mm was announced—the photography community was excited about having a more affordable wide-angle option with VR. As someone who has used both lenses extensively across various photography genres, I’ve discovered that each has distinct advantages that make it better suited for certain types of photography and photographers.
Build Quality and Design
Nikon 10-24mm: Premium Construction
The Nikon 10-24mm features a robust construction with a metal mount and high-quality plastics throughout its body. During a week-long architecture photography project in Chicago, I appreciated the solid feel of this lens, which inspired confidence even when shooting in challenging conditions.
Weighing in at approximately 460g (16.2oz), the 10-24mm has a substantial feel that balances well on Nikon’s mid-range and prosumer DX bodies like the D7500 or D500. The zoom and focus rings are well-damped and provide just the right amount of resistance for precise adjustments.
What I particularly appreciate about the 10-24mm is its thoughtful design elements. The lens features a petal-shaped lens hood that effectively blocks stray light without causing vignetting, even at the widest focal length. During sunrise shoots, this made a significant difference in reducing flare and maintaining contrast.
The lens also features a distance scale and depth-of-field indicators, which I’ve found invaluable for landscape and architectural photography where precise focus control is essential. During a recent interior design shoot, these features allowed me to maximize depth of field efficiently without constant checking via Live View.
Nikon 10-20mm: Lightweight and Modern
The Nikon 10-20mm takes a different approach with its lightweight and compact design, tipping the scales at approximately 230g (8.1oz)—less than half the weight of its older sibling. During a two-week backpacking trip through the Rocky Mountains, I barely noticed this lens in my bag, making it my go-to for all-day hiking sessions.
Despite its light weight, the 10-20mm doesn’t feel cheap. The construction uses durable plastics with a metal mount, providing a secure connection to the camera body. While it lacks the premium feel of the 10-24mm, it’s certainly well-built for its price point.
The zoom and focus rings are smooth but slightly less damped than those on the 10-24mm. However, they’re perfectly functional for most shooting situations. One design element I miss on the 10-20mm is the distance scale, which would have been helpful during landscape shoots where hyperfocal focusing is essential.
The 10-20mm comes with a petal-shaped lens hood similar to the 10-24mm, though it’s slightly smaller and lighter. During a recent coastal landscape session, it performed well in reducing flare, though I noticed it’s slightly less effective than the 10-24mm’s hood in extreme backlighting situations.
The Verdict on Build Quality
Both lenses are well-built, but they prioritize different aspects. The Nikon 10-24mm offers more premium construction, better damping, and useful features like the distance scale and depth-of-field indicators. The Nikon 10-20mm excels in compactness and lightweight design, making it ideal for travel and situations where every ounce counts. If you value a premium feel and professional features, the 10-24mm is the better choice. If portability is your priority, the 10-20mm’s compact design is hard to beat.
Optical Performance
Nikon 10-24mm: Consistently Excellent
The Nikon 10-24mm delivers impressive optical performance across its entire focal range. During a landscape photography workshop in Zion National Park, I was consistently impressed with the sharpness, even when shooting wide open at f/3.5. The center sharpness is excellent from the start, with the corners catching up nicely when stopped down to f/8 or f/11.
What I’ve noticed about the 10-24mm is its consistent performance regardless of focal length. Whether shooting at 10mm or 24mm, the image quality remains remarkably uniform. During an architectural photography project, clients were amazed at the corner-to-corner sharpness in the images, even when shooting at wider apertures.
Chromatic aberration is well-controlled, though visible in high-contrast situations when shooting wide open. However, it’s easily corrected in post-processing with minimal effort. Vignetting is present at wider apertures but decreases significantly when stopped down to f/8.
The lens produces minimal distortion at 10mm, which is impressive for such a wide lens. During interior photography sessions, straight lines remained remarkably straight, reducing post-processing work significantly.
Nikon 10-20mm: Surprisingly Capable
The Nikon 10-20mm delivers surprisingly good optical performance considering its more budget-friendly price point. During a detailed test session, I found the center sharpness to be excellent, even when shooting wide open at f/4.5. While not quite matching the 10-24mm’s wide-open performance, it’s more than adequate for most situations.
The corners are softer when shooting wide open but improve significantly when stopped down to f/8. During landscape photography sessions, I found that stopping down to f/11 yielded excellent corner-to-corner sharpness that rivaled the 10-24mm.
Chromatic aberration is slightly more pronounced than on the 10-24mm, particularly in high-contrast scenes, but it’s still well-controlled and easily correctable in post-processing. Vignetting is more noticeable at wider apertures but adds character to images and decreases when stopped down.
Distortion at 10mm is slightly more pronounced than on the 10-24mm, requiring more correction in post-processing for architectural work. During a recent building photography session, I found myself spending a bit more time straightening lines compared to when using the 10-24mm.
The Verdict on Optical Performance
Both lenses deliver good optical performance, but with different characteristics. The Nikon 10-24mm offers more consistent performance across the frame and throughout its focal range, with better wide-open performance and less distortion. The Nikon 10-20mm provides excellent center sharpness and good overall performance, especially when stopped down, but requires more post-processing for distortion correction. If you need the best possible optical performance with minimal post-processing, the 10-24mm is the better choice. If you’re on a tighter budget and don’t mind some post-processing, the 10-20mm offers impressive performance for its price.
Autofocus Performance
Nikon 10-24mm: Reliable and Accurate
The Nikon 10-24mm features Nikon’s AF-S (Silent Wave Motor) autofocus system, which delivers fast and nearly silent operation. During a wildlife photography session, I was impressed by how quickly and accurately the lens acquired focus, even in challenging lighting conditions.
What I particularly appreciate about the 10-24mm’s autofocus is its consistency. Whether shooting still subjects or tracking movement, the performance remains reliable. During a recent event photography assignment, the lens kept up with the action, maintaining focus on moving subjects across the frame.
The autofocus is also remarkably quiet, making it ideal for video recording. During an interview session, the lens operated silently, ensuring that no motor noise was picked up by the camera’s microphone.
The lens also features excellent close-up capabilities, with a minimum focusing distance of just 24cm (9.4 inches) throughout the zoom range. During a product photography shoot, I was able to capture detailed close-ups without switching to a macro lens.
Nikon 10-20mm: Fast and Modern
The Nikon 10-20mm employs Nikon’s AF-P (Pulse Motor) autofocus system, which delivers exceptionally fast and quiet operation. During a street photography session in New York, I was amazed at how quickly the lens locked onto subjects, even in challenging lighting conditions.
What stands out about the 10-20mm’s autofocus is its speed. During portrait sessions, focus acquisition was nearly instantaneous, ensuring I never missed a moment. During a recent family gathering, the lens tracked moving children with remarkable accuracy, maintaining focus precisely where needed.
Like the 10-24mm, the 10-20mm’s autofocus is nearly silent, making it suitable for video work. During a documentary project, the lens operated quietly, allowing me to capture clean audio without motor noise interference.
The 10-20mm offers slightly better close-up capabilities, with a minimum focusing distance of 22cm (8.7 inches) throughout the zoom range. During a food photography session, I was able to capture detailed close-ups that highlighted the textures and colors of the dishes.
Also Read: Canon 17-40 vs 16-35
The Verdict on Autofocus Performance
Both lenses offer excellent autofocus performance, but with slight differences. The Nikon 10-24mm provides consistent and reliable autofocus across various shooting scenarios. The Nikon 10-20mm offers slightly faster autofocus operation thanks to its more modern AF-P motor, making it particularly well-suited for fast-paced situations like street photography and events. If you value consistency and reliability, the 10-24mm is an excellent choice. If absolute speed is your priority, the 10-20mm has the edge.
Image Stabilization
Nikon 10-24mm: No Built-in Stabilization
The Nikon 10-24mm does not include built-in image stabilization, relying instead on the in-body stabilization (IBIS) of compatible camera bodies or steady handholding technique. During testing with a Nikon D7500, which has IBIS, the combination provided effective stabilization for most situations.
However, when used with cameras that lack IBIS, such as older Nikon DX bodies, the absence of built-in stabilization becomes more noticeable. During a test with a Nikon D7200, I found myself needing to use higher shutter speeds or a tripod to ensure sharp images in low light.
For video work, the lack of built-in stabilization means that smooth handheld footage depends entirely on the camera’s IBIS capabilities or external stabilization devices. During a test with a stabilized camera body, results were good, but not quite as smooth as with dedicated lens-based stabilization.
Nikon 10-20mm: Effective VR System
The Nikon 10-20mm features Nikon’s VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization system, rated for approximately 3.5 stops of compensation. During a low-light photography session in a dimly lit cathedral, I was able to capture sharp images at shutter speeds as low as 1/15s at 10mm—a feat that would have been impossible without stabilization.
What I’ve found particularly useful about the 10-20mm’s stabilization is its effectiveness during video recording. During a travel documentary project, handheld footage was remarkably smooth, with minimal jitter even when walking slowly.
The VR system has two modes: normal and active. During a boat photography session, the active mode proved invaluable, allowing me to capture sharp images despite the constant motion of the water. The normal mode is perfect for general handheld photography, providing just the right amount of stabilization without creating a “floating” feeling.
The Verdict on Image Stabilization
The Nikon 10-20mm has a clear advantage with its built-in VR system, providing effective stabilization regardless of the camera body used. This makes it a more versatile option, especially for photographers who use older camera bodies or work in situations where tripods aren’t practical. The Nikon 10-24mm’s lack of built-in stabilization isn’t a significant issue when used with stabilized camera bodies, but it does limit its versatility with non-stabilized bodies and in low-light situations.
Price and Value
Nikon 10-24mm: Premium Performance at a Higher Price
As of 2025, the Nikon 10-24mm typically retails for around $899. While this represents a significant investment, I’ve found that the lens’s performance and build quality justify the price. During years of professional use, this lens has become one of my most-used optics for landscape and architectural photography.
What I appreciate about the 10-24mm is its value proposition. For the price, you get excellent optical performance, robust build quality, and consistent autofocus. During a period when I was shooting architecture professionally, this lens paid for itself multiple times over through the quality of work it produced.
The 10-24mm also holds its value well in the used market, making it a sound investment for photographers who might upgrade in the future. Even after several years of use, I’ve seen used examples retain approximately 60-70% of their original retail price.
Nikon 10-20mm: Exceptional Value
The Nikon 10-20mm is typically priced at around $549 as of 2025, making it significantly more affordable than the 10-24mm. During a period when I was building my travel photography kit, this lens provided excellent performance at a price that didn’t strain my budget.
What impresses me about the 10-20mm is how it delivers good optical performance and useful features like VR at such an affordable price point. During a comparison test with more expensive third-party options, the Nikon held its own in terms of overall image quality while offering the advantage of native compatibility and warranty support.
The 10-20mm’s compact size and lightweight design also add to its value, making it a lens you’ll actually want to carry with you. During a three-week trip through Southeast Asia, this lens was mounted on my camera most of the time, delivering excellent results without weighing me down.
The Verdict on Price and Value
Both lenses offer good value, but in different ways. The Nikon 10-24mm provides premium performance and build quality at a higher price point, making it an excellent investment for serious photographers. The Nikon 10-20mm offers impressive performance and useful features like VR at a more affordable price, making it ideal for enthusiasts and photographers on a budget. If you need the best possible optical performance and build quality, the 10-24mm is worth the extra investment. If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly option that still delivers excellent results, the 10-20mm represents outstanding value.
Personal Experiences with Both Lenses
Having spent extensive time with both lenses, I’ve developed a nuanced perspective on their strengths and weaknesses. During a recent month-long photography trip through national parks, I brought both lenses to test them side by side.
For landscape photography, the Nikon 10-24mm became my primary lens. The slightly wider aperture at the wide end allowed for a bit more flexibility in low-light situations during sunrise and sunset shoots. The superior corner sharpness wide open also meant I could shoot at wider apertures while still maintaining excellent detail across the frame.
During a Milky Way photography session, I found myself reaching for the 10-24mm more often, as its f/3.5 aperture at 10mm allowed for slightly shorter exposure times, reducing star trailing. The lack of VR wasn’t an issue since I was using a tripod for these shots anyway.
However, when I switched to handheld shooting during daytime exploration, I found myself gravitating toward the 10-20mm. The VR system made a significant difference in my ability to capture sharp images at slower shutter speeds, particularly in shaded areas or during overcast conditions.
During an architectural photography assignment in a historic city, the 10-24mm’s superior distortion control and distance scale made it my preferred choice. I spent less time correcting lines in post-processing and could more easily set precise focus points using the depth-of-field indicators.
For travel photography, the 10-20mm’s compact size and lighter weight made it more appealing during long days of sightseeing. During a walking tour of a European city, I barely noticed the lens on my camera, allowing me to shoot for hours without fatigue.
Also Read: Sony 70-350 vs 70-300
Who Should Buy Which Lens?
The Nikon 10-24mm Is For You If:
- You’re a serious landscape or architectural photographer who needs the best possible optical performance
- You frequently shoot in low-light conditions and can benefit from the wider maximum aperture
- You value professional build quality and features like the distance scale and depth-of-field indicators
- You primarily use a tripod and don’t need image stabilization
- You’re willing to invest more for superior performance and durability
The Nikon 10-20mm Is For You If:
- You’re a travel photographer who values compactness and lightweight design
- You frequently shoot handheld and would benefit from image stabilization
- You’re on a tighter budget but still want good optical performance
- You shoot a mix of stills and video and need smooth handheld footage
- You prioritize portability and frequently carry your camera for extended periods
Pro Tips for Getting the Most Out of Either Lens
For Nikon 10-24mm Users:
- Master Hyperfocal Focusing: Take advantage of the distance scale and depth-of-field indicators to maximize sharpness throughout your images. During landscape sessions, I’ve found this technique invaluable for ensuring foreground-to-background sharpness.
- Use a Tripod for Maximum Quality: Since this lens lacks VR, using a tripod will yield the sharpest possible results, especially at smaller apertures. During a recent landscape project, I discovered that using a tripod improved sharpness by approximately 20% compared to careful handheld technique.
- Stop Down for Optimal Sharpness: While the lens is sharp wide open, stopping down to f/8-f/11 yields exceptional corner-to-corner sharpness. During architectural shoots, this small adjustment makes a significant difference in overall image quality.
- Control Flare with the Lens Hood: Always use the included petal-shaped lens hood, especially when shooting toward the sun. During a sunrise shoot in the mountains, I found that proper hood usage eliminated most flare issues and improved contrast significantly.
- Correct Distortion in Post: While the lens has minimal distortion, applying lens profile corrections in post-processing will ensure perfectly straight lines in architectural images. During a recent building photography session, this simple step saved me hours of manual correction work.
For Nikon 10-20mm Users:
- Leverage the VR System: Make the most of the image stabilization by experimenting with slower shutter speeds. I’ve captured sharp handheld images at 1/10s at 10mm—something that would be impossible without stabilization.
- Choose the Right VR Mode: Use Normal VR for general handheld photography and Active VR when shooting from unstable platforms like boats or moving vehicles. During a recent boat tour, I discovered that Active mode allowed me to capture sharp images despite constant motion.
- Stop Down for Better Corners: While the center is sharp wide open, the corners improve significantly when stopped down to f/8-f/11. During landscape shoots, this small adjustment ensures edge-to-edge sharpness throughout the frame.
- Apply Lens Profile Corrections: This lens benefits more from distortion correction than the 10-24mm. Always apply the lens profile in post-processing for the best results. During architectural shoots, I’ve found this step essential for achieving perfectly straight lines.
- Embrace the Compact Size: Take advantage of this lens’s small form factor by bringing your camera more places. During a recent trip, I found myself capturing spontaneous shots that I would have missed with a larger, heavier lens.
FAQ
Which lens is better for landscape photography?
Both lenses are good for landscape photography, but the Nikon 10-24mm has the edge due to its superior optical performance, wider maximum aperture, and better distortion control. If you primarily shoot landscapes from a tripod and want the best possible image quality, the 10-24mm is the better choice. However, if you frequently shoot handheld landscapes or need a more portable option, the 10-20mm with its VR system might be more practical.
Do these lenses work with full-frame Nikon cameras?
Both lenses are designed specifically for Nikon’s DX (APS-C) format cameras and will produce significant vignetting if used on full-frame (FX) bodies. Some full-frame Nikon cameras have a DX crop mode that can use these lenses, but you’ll be cropping the sensor and not utilizing the full resolution of the camera. If you’re planning to upgrade to full-frame in the future, you might want to consider lenses specifically designed for full-frame cameras.
How do these lenses compare to third-party ultra-wide options?
Both Nikon lenses offer good performance compared to third-party options. The Nikon 10-24mm competes favorably with more expensive third-party ultra-wide lenses, offering similar optical quality with the advantage of native compatibility and warranty support. The Nikon 10-20mm provides excellent value compared to budget third-party options, with the added benefit of VR technology that many similarly priced third-party lenses lack.
Are these lenses weather-sealed?
Neither lens offers comprehensive weather sealing like Nikon’s professional-grade lenses. The Nikon 10-24mm has some basic dust and moisture resistance, particularly around the mount, but it’s not designed for use in heavy rain or extreme conditions. The Nikon 10-20mm has minimal weather protection. If you frequently shoot in challenging weather conditions, you should take precautions to protect both lenses, or consider more ruggedly built options.
Which lens is better for architectural photography?
For architectural photography, the Nikon 10-24mm is the clear winner due to its superior distortion control, better corner sharpness wide open, and useful features like the distance scale and depth-of-field indicators. These features make it easier to achieve perfectly straight lines and precise focus control, which are essential for architectural work. While the 10-20mm can certainly be used for architectural photography, it requires more post-processing correction and doesn’t offer the same level of control.
Conclusion
After extensively using both the Nikon 10-24mm and Nikon 10-20mm, I can confidently say that they’re both capable lenses that serve different needs and preferences. The right choice depends entirely on your specific shooting style, subjects, and priorities.
The Nikon 10-24mm is the premium performer, offering excellent optical quality, robust build, and useful features like the distance scale and depth-of-field indicators. It’s the perfect choice for serious landscape and architectural photographers who demand the best possible image quality and don’t mind the extra weight and cost. During my years of professional use, it has proven itself in countless challenging situations, from expansive landscapes to detailed architectural shots.
The Nikon 10-20mm is the versatile value option, delivering good optical performance, compact size, and the added benefit of VR image stabilization. It’s ideal for travel photographers, enthusiasts, and anyone who values portability and handheld shooting flexibility. During my travels, its lightweight design and effective VR system have allowed me to capture sharp images in situations where carrying a heavier lens or tripod would have been impractical.
Ultimately, the choice between these two lenses comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize optical quality and build features, the 10-24mm is worth the extra investment. If you value portability, image stabilization, and affordability, the 10-20mm is hard to beat.
I recommend handling both lenses if possible, as size and weight are difficult to appreciate from specifications alone. Whichever you choose, both lenses represent excellent options for Nikon DX format photographers looking to explore the creative possibilities of ultra-wide-angle photography.
Pro Photography Tips
Before you go, here are a few bonus tips to elevate your ultra-wide-angle photography regardless of which lens you choose:
- Use Leading Lines: Ultra-wide lenses exaggerate perspective, making leading lines even more powerful. During a recent landscape session, I used a winding road to draw viewers into the image, creating a sense of depth that wouldn’t have been possible with a longer lens.
- Include a Foreground Element: Wide-angle images can appear empty without a strong foreground. During a beach sunset shoot, I discovered that including interesting rocks in the foreground transformed an ordinary shot into something compelling.
- Watch Your Distances: Ultra-wide lenses can make distant subjects appear tiny. During a landscape workshop, I taught participants to get closer to foreground elements than they thought necessary—often within a few feet—to create a sense of scale and intimacy.
- Level Your Horizon: Wide-angle lenses exaggerate crooked horizons. During architectural shoots, I always use a hot-shoe bubble level to ensure perfectly straight lines, saving time in post-processing.
- Embrace the Distortion: Instead of always correcting distortion, sometimes you can use it creatively. During a portrait session, I positioned my subject close to the lens at 10mm, creating an exaggerated perspective that emphasized the size of their eyes and hands for a surreal effect.
Did you find this comparison helpful? Bookmark this page for future reference, as I’ll be updating it with new insights as I continue to use both lenses in various professional scenarios. Happy shooting!