I’ve spent countless hours researching, testing, and shooting with both the Mamiya RZ67 and its successor, the Pro II. Let me tell you, when you’re standing in a camera store trying to decide between these two legendary medium format cameras, the choice isn’t as simple as it might seem. I’ve been exactly where you are right now, and I’m here to share everything I’ve discovered about these incredible cameras.
What I Discovered About These Medium Format Giants?
When I first got into medium format photography, I was overwhelmed by the choices. The Mamiya RZ67 system kept popping up in forums, YouTube videos, and conversations with fellow photographers. But here’s the thing – nobody seemed to give me a straight answer about whether I should get the original RZ67 or spring for the Pro II version. That’s why I decided to dive deep and test both extensively.
The Mamiya RZ67 series represents some of the most affordable yet professional medium format systems you can get your hands on today. These cameras have been used by everyone from Charles O’Rear (who shot the famous Windows XP “Bliss” wallpaper) to countless studio professionals and passionate amateurs like you and me.
The Key Differences That Actually Matter
After months of shooting with both cameras, I’ve identified the real-world differences that impact your photography experience. Let me break them down for you:
1. The Focusing System: A Game Changer
I’ll be honest – this is where the Pro II really shines. The original RZ67 has a basic focusing system that works fine, but the Pro II adds something that changed my shooting experience completely: a fine-tune focusing knob.
What this means for you:
- The Pro II has dual focusing knobs – one for each hand
- There’s a dedicated micro-focusing knob for precise adjustments
- When I’m doing macro work or portrait photography, this feature alone has saved countless shots
- The original RZ67 feels clunky in comparison once you’ve used the Pro II
I discovered this difference while shooting portraits during a golden hour session. With the Pro II, I could nail focus perfectly on my subject’s eyes while maintaining composition. With the original RZ67, I was constantly second-guessing my focus.
2. Shutter Speed Control: Precision Matters
Here’s something that might not seem like a big deal until you’re in a tricky lighting situation: the Pro II offers half-stop increments on the shutter speed dial, while the original RZ67 only gives you full-stop adjustments.
Real-world impact:
- Pro II: 0.5-stop steps for precise exposure control
- Original RZ67: Full-stop increments only
- When you’re shooting slide film (which has less exposure latitude), this precision is invaluable
- The Pro II works seamlessly with AE prism finders for semi-automatic exposure
I found this particularly useful when shooting landscapes during changing light conditions. Being able to dial in exactly the right exposure instead of having to choose between “too bright” and “too dark” made a significant difference in my final images.
3. Electronic Improvements: More Than Just Marketing
Mamiya didn’t just add a few features and call it a day with the Pro II. They made substantial electronic improvements that I’ve noticed in day-to-day use:
What’s actually better:
- More reliable electronic system overall
- Better power management (those 6V batteries last longer)
- Improved circuitry that’s less prone to failure
- Better communication with accessories like AE prisms
I’ve owned both models, and I can tell you that the Pro II feels more solid and dependable. When you’re in the middle of an important shoot, knowing your camera won’t let you down is priceless.
4. The Viewing Experience: Seeing is Believing
This is one of those differences you don’t fully appreciate until you look through both viewfinders side by side. The Pro II has a significantly brighter viewing screen that makes composing and focusing much easier.
Why this matters:
- Brighter screen = easier focusing, especially in low light
- Better contrast helps with critical focus accuracy
- Less eye strain during long shooting sessions
- Makes waist-level finder shooting much more enjoyable
I noticed this immediately when I switched from my original RZ67 to a Pro II. Suddenly, I could see details I was missing before, and my hit rate for perfectly focused shots improved dramatically.
5. Weight and Ergonomics: Every Ounce Counts
Let’s be real – these cameras aren’t lightweight. But the Pro II manages to be slightly lighter and better balanced than its predecessor.
The numbers:
- Original RZ67: Approximately 2.5kg (5.5lbs) with lens
- Pro II: Noticeably lighter and better balanced
- The difference might seem small, but when you’re carrying it all day, you’ll feel it
I took both cameras on a 20km hike once (don’t ask me why – I was young and enthusiastic), and by the end of the day, I could definitely tell which one was easier to handle.
6. Film Backs: The Hidden Advantage
This is something that doesn’t get talked about enough, but it’s crucial for long-term ownership: the Pro II film backs use light labyrinths instead of foam seals.
Why this is a big deal:
- No foam means no foam deterioration over time
- Light labyrinths don’t need replacing
- Pro II backs have an extra frame counter window
- Better long-term reliability and less maintenance
I’ve seen too many photographers buy original RZ67 backs only to discover they need expensive foam replacement. The Pro II backs just keep working without this issue.
My Personal Experience: Which One Would I Choose In 2025?
After shooting extensively with both cameras, I have to say that the Pro II is my clear choice for most photographers. But here’s the thing – it’s not always the right choice for everyone.
When the Original RZ67 Makes Sense:
I’d recommend the original RZ67 if:
- You’re on a tight budget (they’re significantly cheaper)
- You’re just starting with medium format photography
- You mostly shoot in controlled studio conditions
- You don’t mind full-stop shutter speed increments
- You’re comfortable with basic focusing systems
The original RZ67 is still an incredible camera that produces stunning images. I’ve taken some of my favorite photos with the original model, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with it.
When the Pro II is Worth the Extra Money?:
I’d spring for the Pro II if:
- You shoot in varied lighting conditions regularly
- You do portrait or macro work where precise focus is critical
- You want the most reliable and refined system
- You plan to use AE prism finders
- You want the best long-term investment
The Pro II costs more, but in my experience, it’s worth every penny for serious photographers. The improvements aren’t just marketing fluff – they make a real difference in your shooting experience and final results.
Technical Specifications: The Nitty-Gritty Details
Let me break down the exact specifications so you can see exactly what you’re getting with each camera:
Mamiya RZ67 Professional (Original – 1982)
- Introduction: 1982
- Shutter Speeds: 8 seconds to 1/400 second, full-stop increments only
- Focusing: Basic single-knob system
- Viewing Screen: Standard brightness
- Weight: Approximately 2.5kg with standard lens
- Film Backs: Foam seals (require periodic replacement)
- Electronics: Basic system, less refined
- AE Compatibility: Limited compatibility with AE prisms
Mamiya RZ67 Professional II (1995)
- Introduction: 1995
- Shutter Speeds: 8 seconds to 1/400 second, half-stop increments
- Focusing: Dual knobs with fine-tune micro-focus knob
- Viewing Screen: Significantly brighter and higher contrast
- Weight: Lighter and better balanced
- Film Backs: Light labyrinth seals (no foam to replace)
- Electronics: Improved, more reliable system
- AE Compatibility: Full compatibility with AE prism finders
Mamiya RZ67 Professional IID (2004)
- Introduction: 2004
- Key Addition: Integrated digital back interface
- Other Features: Same as Pro II plus digital compatibility
Real-World Shooting Scenarios: What I’ve Learned?
I want to share some specific shooting scenarios where I’ve noticed the differences between these cameras:
Portrait Photography
When I’m shooting portraits, the Pro II’s fine-focus knob has been a game-changer. I can precisely focus on my subject’s eyes while maintaining composition, something that’s much more difficult with the original RZ67. The brighter viewfinder also makes it easier to see facial expressions and catchlights.
Landscape Photography
For landscape work, the half-stop shutter speed increments on the Pro II give me more control over my exposure, especially when using slide film. I’ve found that I can capture more subtle tonal variations in skies and shadows with this precision.
Studio Photography
In the studio, both cameras perform well, but the Pro II’s improved electronics and better AE prism compatibility make it easier to work with lighting setups. I’ve had fewer instances of miscommunication between the camera and my studio strobes with the Pro II.
Street Photography
Let’s be honest – neither camera is ideal for street photography due to their size and weight. But if I had to choose, the Pro II’s slightly lighter weight and better balance make it marginally more manageable for handheld shooting.
The Investment Perspective: Value Over Time
I’ve bought and sold several of these cameras over the years, and I’ve learned a thing or two about their value retention and long-term costs:
Initial Purchase Price
- Original RZ67: $300-600 depending on condition
- Pro II: $600-1,200 depending on condition and included accessories
Long-Term Ownership Costs
- Original RZ67: Factor in $100-200 for foam replacement every few years
- Pro II: Virtually no maintenance costs beyond regular cleaning
Resale Value
- Both cameras hold their value well
- Pro II typically retains a higher percentage of original purchase price
- Well-maintained examples of either model can sell for close to purchase price
My Final Recommendation: Making Your Choice
After all this research and hands-on experience, here’s my honest advice:
Get the original RZ67 if:
- You’re budget-conscious
- You’re new to medium format
- You shoot mostly in controlled conditions
- You don’t mind basic features
Get the Pro II if:
- You can afford the extra investment
- You’re serious about your photography
- You want the best possible shooting experience
- You plan to use the camera long-term
Get the Pro IID if:
- You plan to use digital backs
- You want the latest and greatest
- Money is no object
For most photographers reading this, I’d recommend the Pro II. It strikes the perfect balance between cost and features, and the improvements make a real difference in your photography.
Pro Tips I’ve Learned Along the Way
Let me share some specific tips I’ve discovered while shooting with these cameras:
Focus Like a Pro
- Use the fine-focus knob on the Pro II for critical focus situations
- For portraits, focus on the eyes using the magnifier
- In low light, take your time – the brighter screen on the Pro II really helps
Exposure Mastery
- Use the half-stop increments on the Pro II for slide film
- When in doubt, bracket your exposures
- The AE prism finder is worth the investment if you shoot in changing light
Maintenance Matters
- Keep your camera clean, especially the lens mount and film back contacts
- Store film backs properly to prevent light leaks
- Have your camera serviced every few years if you shoot regularly
Accessory Recommendations
- Invest in a good quality waist-level finder
- Consider the left-hand grip with shutter release for handheld shooting
- A good sturdy tripod is essential for the best results
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the image quality different between the RZ67 and Pro II?
No, both cameras use the same lenses and produce identical image quality. The differences are purely in handling and features.
Can I use RZ67 lenses on both models?
Yes, all RZ67 lenses are compatible with both the original RZ67 and Pro II models.
Is the Pro II worth the extra cost?
In my experience, yes – if you’re serious about photography. The improved focusing, shutter speed control, and better viewfinder make a significant difference in real-world use.
Do I need special batteries for these cameras?
Both cameras use 6V 4SR44 or 4LR44 batteries. They’re readily available but keep spares on hand.
Can I use digital backs with these cameras?
The original RZ67 and Pro II can use digital backs with additional adapters. The Pro IID has built-in digital back compatibility.
How often do these cameras need servicing?
With regular use, I recommend having them serviced every 3-5 years. They’re built like tanks but benefit from periodic maintenance.
Are there common problems to watch out for?
For the original RZ67, watch for deteriorating foam seals. For both models, check the shutter speeds and mirror mechanism functionality before purchase.
Which model is better for beginners?
The original RZ67 is more affordable and thus better for beginners, but the Pro II is easier to use effectively.
My Final Thoughts
After spending countless hours with both cameras, I can confidently say that the Mamiya RZ67 Pro II is the superior choice for most photographers. The improvements aren’t just minor tweaks – they fundamentally change the shooting experience for the better.
However, the original RZ67 is still an incredible camera that produces stunning images. If budget is your main concern, you won’t be disappointed with the original model.
What I’ve learned through this journey is that the best camera is the one you’ll actually use and enjoy. Both of these cameras have the potential to create amazing medium format photographs that will blow you away with their detail and tonality.
I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you make the right choice for your photography journey. Remember, whichever model you choose, you’re getting into one of the most rewarding and enjoyable camera systems ever made.
Ready to start your medium format journey? Bookmark this guide for reference, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions about these incredible cameras. Happy shooting!