I’ve spent countless hours shooting with both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 systems, and I’m here to tell you that choosing between these two legendary medium format cameras isn’t as simple as picking the “better” one. It’s about finding the right tool for your specific photography journey. When I first ventured into medium format photography, I was overwhelmed by the options and conflicting advice I found online. That’s why I’m writing this comprehensive comparison – to help you make an informed decision based on real-world experience rather than just technical specifications.
The Mamiya 645 and RB67 represent two different philosophies in medium format photography. The 645 is the versatile, portable workhorse that’s perfect for photographers on the move, while the RB67 is the studio beast that delivers unparalleled image quality at the cost of portability. I’ve discovered that each camera has its own personality and strengths, and understanding these differences is crucial for making the right choice.
In this detailed comparison, I’ll walk you through every aspect of these cameras, from their build quality and handling to image quality and real-world performance. I’ll share my personal experiences with both systems, including the moments when each camera truly shined and the situations where one outperformed the other. Whether you’re a portrait photographer, landscape enthusiast, or someone looking to upgrade from 35mm film, this guide will help you understand which Mamiya system aligns with your photography goals.
Quick Overview: Mamiya 645 vs RB67 at a Glance
Before diving deep into the specifics, let me give you a quick overview of what each system brings to the table. When I’m comparing cameras for myself or helping fellow photographers, I find it helpful to start with the big picture differences.
The Mamiya 645 system shoots in the 6×4.5cm format, giving you 15-16 shots per roll of 120 film. It’s designed with portability in mind, making it an excellent choice for handheld photography, weddings, and travel. I’ve found that the 645’s ergonomics feel more familiar to photographers coming from 35mm systems, which makes the transition to medium format much smoother.
On the other hand, the Mamiya RB67 shoots in the larger 6×7cm format, yielding 10 shots per roll of 120 film. This camera is built like a tank and is primarily designed for studio work, landscape photography, and situations where ultimate image quality is the priority. I remember the first time I held an RB67 – I was shocked by its weight and size, but equally impressed by its solid construction and the sheer quality of the images it produces.
Key Differences at a Glance: Mamiya 645 vs RB67
| Feature | Mamiya 645 | Mamiya RB67 |
|---|---|---|
| Film Format | 6×4.5cm | 6×7cm |
| Shots per 120 roll | 15-16 | 10 |
| Weight | 2-3 lbs (body + lens) | 5-6 lbs (body + lens) |
| Best Use Case | Handheld, travel, weddings | Studio, landscape, portraits |
| Film Back Changes | Limited mid-roll changes | Easy mid-roll changes |
| Portability | Good | Poor |
| Image Quality | Excellent | Exceptional |
Build Quality and Design: A Tale of Two Philosophies
I’ve always believed that the way a camera feels in your hands is just as important as the images it produces. Both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 excel in build quality, but they approach it from completely different angles.
Mamiya 645: The Portable Workhorse
The Mamiya 645 series evolved significantly over the years, with models ranging from the all-metal M645 1000S to the more plastic-bodied 645 Super and Pro models. I’ve had the pleasure of shooting with several versions, and I can tell you that the earlier models like the 1000S have a satisfying heft and durability that’s hard to match.
What I love about the 645 system is how it balances portability with professional features. The camera feels substantial in your hands but not overwhelmingly heavy. I’ve carried my 645 for hours during street photography sessions and wedding shoots without feeling fatigued. The controls are well-placed and intuitive, especially if you’re coming from a 35mm background.
One design feature I particularly appreciate is the modular nature of the 645 system. While not as extensive as the RB67’s modularity, you can still swap viewfinders, focusing screens, and add motor drives to customize the camera to your needs. I discovered that this flexibility makes the 645 adaptable to various shooting situations, from fast-paced event photography to more deliberate portrait sessions.
The ergonomics of the 645 are worth mentioning too. The camera sits comfortably in your hands, with the shutter release and advance controls positioned for quick access. I’ve found that I can shoot quickly and confidently with the 645, which is crucial for capturing those fleeting moments that make medium format photography so rewarding.
Mamiya RB67: The Studio Tank
If the 645 is a portable workhorse, the RB67 is literally a tank – in the best possible way. The first time I picked up an RB67, I was struck by its sheer mass and solid construction. This camera is built almost entirely of metal, with leatherette covering that gives it a classic, professional appearance.
The RB67’s design philosophy is all about stability and precision. Every component feels over-engineered in the most satisfying way. The revolving back mechanism, which gives the RB its name, is a brilliant piece of engineering that allows you to switch between horizontal and vertical orientations without rotating the entire camera. I’ve found this feature invaluable in the studio, where maintaining consistent lighting and composition while switching orientations is crucial.
What impresses me most about the RB67’s build quality is its reliability. These cameras are fully mechanical, meaning they don’t rely on batteries for core functions. I’ve shot with RB67s that are decades old and they still function perfectly. The leaf shutter system in the lenses is another testament to the camera’s build quality – it’s precise, reliable, and allows for flash synchronization at all shutter speeds.
The weight and size of the RB67 are definitely factors to consider. At 5-6 pounds with a standard lens, this camera demands respect and proper handling technique. I’ve learned to use a tripod or monopod for extended shooting sessions, and I always make sure to support the lens properly when handholding. While this might seem like a drawback, I’ve come to appreciate that the weight contributes to the camera’s stability and the sharpness of the images it produces.
Design Comparison: Which Feels Better?
After spending hundreds of hours with both systems, I can tell you that neither is objectively “better” in terms of design – they’re just different. The 645 feels like a natural extension of your hand, while the RB67 feels like a precision instrument that demands your full attention.
I’ve found that the 645’s design lends itself to spontaneous, intuitive shooting. When I’m covering a wedding or shooting street photography, the 645 becomes an extension of my vision, allowing me to react quickly to changing scenes. The RB67, on the other hand, encourages a more deliberate approach. When I’m working with the RB67, I find myself slowing down, considering each frame more carefully, and really connecting with my subject.
Image Quality and Resolution: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s talk about what really matters – the images these cameras produce. After all, isn’t that why we’re drawn to medium format photography in the first place? I’ve shot countless rolls of film through both systems, and I can tell you that both deliver exceptional results, but with some important differences.
Mamiya 645: Excellent Quality with Practical Advantages
The Mamiya 645 produces negatives that are 6×4.5cm, which is nearly three times larger than a full-frame 35mm negative. This size increase translates to remarkable improvements in detail, tonal range, and overall image quality. I’ve been consistently impressed by the sharpness and clarity of 645 negatives, especially when paired with Mamiya’s excellent lenses.
One aspect of the 645’s image quality that I particularly appreciate is its versatility across different film types. Whether I’m shooting Portra 400 for portraits, Tri-X for street photography, or Velvia 50 for landscapes, the 645 handles everything beautifully. The 6×4.5 format provides a nice balance between the convenience of 35mm and the ultimate quality of larger formats.
I’ve discovered that the 645 system really shines in handheld situations. The combination of relatively light weight and excellent image stabilization (from proper handholding technique) means I can consistently produce sharp images at slower shutter speeds. This has been invaluable for my documentary work and wedding photography, where tripods aren’t always practical.
The aspect ratio of the 645 format is another point in its favor. At 1.33:1, it’s very close to the 3:2 ratio of 35mm photography, making it familiar and versatile for various applications. I’ve found this ratio works well for everything from portraits to landscapes, and it’s easy to crop to other formats if needed.
Mamiya RB67: The Ultimate Image Quality Machine
If the 645 delivers excellent image quality, the RB67 takes it to another level entirely. The 6×7cm negative is significantly larger than the 645’s, and this difference is immediately apparent when you look at the resulting images. I remember the first time I made a 16×20 print from an RB67 negative – the detail and tonal range were absolutely breathtaking.
What really sets the RB67 apart is the combination of large negative size and exceptional lenses. The RB lenses are among the finest ever made for medium format photography, with incredible sharpness, beautiful bokeh, and minimal distortion. I’ve found that even when shooting wide open, RB lenses maintain remarkable sharpness across the frame.
The larger negative size of the RB67 also provides more flexibility in post-processing and printing. I’ve cropped RB67 negatives severely and still maintained excellent quality, something that’s much harder to do with smaller formats. This has been particularly useful for my commercial work, where clients often request different crops of the same image.
Another advantage of the RB67’s image quality is its ability to handle high-resolution scanning. When I scan RB67 negatives at high resolution, I’m often amazed at the level of detail captured. This makes the system particularly valuable for digital workflows and large-format printing.
Also Read: Sony A6600 vs A7IV
Real-World Image Quality Comparison
To give you a practical sense of how these cameras compare in real-world shooting, let me share some observations from my experience:
For portrait photography, both systems excel, but in different ways. The 645 produces beautiful portraits with excellent skin tones and detail, and its portability makes it easier to work with subjects and capture natural expressions. The RB67, while more cumbersome, produces portraits with incredible detail and a three-dimensional quality that’s hard to match. I’ve found that the extra effort required to use the RB67 is often worth it for formal portrait sessions.
In landscape photography, the RB67’s advantages become more apparent. The larger negative captures more detail in shadows and highlights, making it easier to recover information in post-processing. However, the 645’s portability means I’m more likely to actually carry it on long hikes, which sometimes results in better images simply because I have the camera with me.
For street and documentary photography, the 645 is clearly the winner. Its faster handling and lighter weight make it much more suitable for capturing spontaneous moments. While I’ve tried street photography with the RB67, it’s simply too cumbersome for most situations.
Versatility and Portability: Real-World Performance
Image quality is important, but a camera’s versatility and portability often determine how often you’ll actually use it. I’ve learned this lesson the hard way – owning the “best” camera doesn’t matter if you leave it at home because it’s too heavy or cumbersome.
Mamiya 645: The Do-Everything System
One of the things I love most about the Mamiya 645 system is its versatility. This camera can handle just about any photographic situation you throw at it, making it a true all-rounder in the medium format world.
I’ve used my 645 for everything from wedding photography to landscape work, and it has performed admirably in every situation. The camera’s relatively light weight (compared to other medium format systems) means I’m more likely to take it with me, and its intuitive controls mean I can focus on composition rather than fumbling with settings.
The 645 system’s versatility is enhanced by its range of available lenses and accessories. Mamiya produced an extensive lineup of lenses for the 645 mount, ranging from wide-angle to telephoto, and I’ve found the optical quality to be consistently excellent. Whether I need a 35mm wide-angle for landscapes or a 210mm telephoto for portraits, there’s a lens for the job.
Battery life is another practical consideration where the 645 shines. Most models use common batteries that are easy to find and replace, and I’ve never had a battery die at an inconvenient moment. This reliability is crucial for professional work where you can’t afford to miss shots.
Mamiya RB67: The Specialist’s Choice
The RB67 is, by its nature, less versatile than the 645, but it excels in its intended applications. This camera is designed for situations where image quality is the absolute priority, and portability is secondary.
I’ve found the RB67 to be unparalleled for studio work, portrait sessions, and landscape photography where I can use a tripod. The camera’s modular design allows me to configure it exactly how I need it for each situation, and the revolving back is invaluable for maintaining composition while switching between horizontal and vertical orientations.
However, the RB67’s limitations become apparent when you try to use it outside of its comfort zone. At 5-6 pounds with a standard lens, it’s significantly heavier than the 645, making it challenging to use for extended handheld shooting. I’ve tried using it for event photography, but the weight and slower handling make it less than ideal for fast-paced situations.
The RB67 also requires more careful handling and maintenance. The mechanical nature of the camera means it needs regular cleaning and lubrication to maintain optimal performance. I’ve learned to treat my RB67 with the respect it deserves, and in return, it delivers consistently outstanding results.
Portability in Practice
Let me share a real-world example that illustrates the portability difference between these systems. Last year, I was photographing a wedding and had both cameras with me. I started with the RB67 for the formal portraits, and the results were stunning – the detail and tonal range were exactly what the couple wanted. However, when it came time for the reception and candid shots, I switched to the 645 and never looked back. The 645 allowed me to move freely, react quickly to moments, and capture the spontaneous joy of the celebration without being weighed down by equipment.
This experience taught me that the ideal setup often involves having both systems available, using each for what it does best. The RB67 for when ultimate quality is needed and the situation allows for careful, deliberate photography, and the 645 for everything else.
Lens Systems and Optical Quality
The lenses are arguably the most important part of any camera system, and both Mamiya 645 and RB67 have exceptional glass available. I’ve shot extensively with lenses from both systems, and I can tell you that both offer outstanding optical quality, but with some important differences.
Mamiya 645 Lens System
The Mamiya 645 system boasts an extensive lineup of lenses that cover just about every photographic need. From wide-angle to telephoto, and including specialty lenses like macros and shift lenses, the 645 system has you covered.
I’ve been particularly impressed with the Mamiya-Sekor C series lenses for the 645. These manual focus lenses offer excellent sharpness, beautiful color rendition, and pleasing bokeh. The 80mm f/2.8 standard lens is a workhorse that I’ve used for everything from portraits to landscapes, and it rarely disappoints.
One advantage of the 645 lens system is the availability of both manual focus and autofocus options. While I personally prefer the tactile experience of manual focus lenses, the autofocus options can be valuable for situations where speed is crucial. I’ve found that even the manual focus lenses are relatively easy to focus accurately, thanks to the bright viewfinders and good focusing screens available for the 645 system.
The 645 lenses are also relatively compact and lightweight compared to their RB67 counterparts. This makes the entire system more portable and easier to handle, especially for handheld shooting. I’ve carried a three-lens kit for my 645 on long photo walks without feeling overly burdened.
Mamiya RB67 Lens System
The RB67 lens system is legendary among medium format photographers, and for good reason. These lenses are among the finest ever made for medium format photography, offering exceptional sharpness, beautiful rendering, and robust construction.
What sets RB67 lenses apart is their built-in leaf shutter system. Unlike focal plane shutters, leaf shutters allow for flash synchronization at all shutter speeds, which is invaluable for studio and portrait photography. I’ve found this feature particularly useful when mixing flash with ambient light, as it gives me complete control over the lighting balance.
The optical quality of RB67 lenses is simply outstanding. I’ve shot with the 90mm f/3.8 standard lens, the 127mm f/4.7 portrait lens, and the 50mm wide-angle, and each has delivered exceptional results. The sharpness across the frame is remarkable, even when shooting wide open, and the color rendition is rich and accurate.
One thing to note about RB67 lenses is their size and weight. These are substantial pieces of glass that add significantly to the overall weight of the system. While this might seem like a drawback, I’ve come to appreciate that the size contributes to the lenses’ optical performance and durability.
Lens Comparison and Compatibility
When comparing the lens systems, it’s important to consider your specific needs. The 645 system offers more versatility and portability, while the RB67 system provides ultimate optical quality and specialized features like leaf shutters.
I’ve discovered that lens choice often comes down to the type of photography you do most. For general purpose and handheld photography, the 645 lenses are more practical. For studio work, portraits, and situations where ultimate quality is needed, the RB67 lenses are hard to beat.
It’s also worth noting that there are adapters available that allow you to use RB67 lenses on 645 bodies, though with some limitations. I’ve experimented with this setup and found that while it works, it’s often more practical to use the lenses with their intended systems.
Film Handling and Practical Considerations
How a camera handles film is a crucial aspect of the shooting experience, and it’s an area where the Mamiya 645 and RB67 differ significantly. I’ve loaded countless rolls of film through both systems, and I’ve developed strong preferences based on real-world use.
Mamiya 645 Film Handling
The Mamiya 645 system uses 120 and 220 film, producing 15-16 exposures per 120 roll or 30-32 exposures per 220 roll. I’ve found the film loading process to be relatively straightforward, though it does require some practice to master.
One limitation of the 645 system is that most models don’t allow for mid-roll film changes. Once you start a roll, you’re committed to finishing it before you can switch to a different film type. This can be inconvenient if you like to switch between color and black and white during a shoot, as I often do.
However, the 645 does offer some advantages in film handling. The smaller negative size means you get more exposures per roll, which can be more economical and reduces the frequency of film changes. I’ve found this particularly useful for event photography where I don’t want to miss moments while changing film.
The film advance mechanism on the 645 is smooth and reliable, and I’ve rarely experienced film loading issues once I got the hang of the process. The winding crank is well-positioned and easy to operate, even when shooting quickly.
Mamiya RB67 Film Handling
The RB67 really shines when it comes to film handling, thanks to its modular back system. The camera uses interchangeable film backs that can be swapped mid-roll, which is incredibly useful for professional work.
I love being able to switch between different film types without having to finish an entire roll first. This feature alone has saved me countless times during portrait sessions where I want to offer clients both color and black and white options. The ability to switch backs also means I can preload multiple backs with different films, making me more efficient on location.
The RB67 produces 10 exposures per 120 roll, which is fewer than the 645 but the larger negative size often justifies the trade-off. I’ve found that the quality difference is significant enough that I’m willing to accept fewer frames per roll when the situation calls for ultimate image quality.
Loading film into RB67 backs is a bit more involved than with the 645, but once you master the process, it becomes second nature. The dark slide system adds a layer of safety that prevents accidental exposure when changing backs, which I appreciate when working on important shoots.
Practical Film Considerations
In my experience, the film handling differences between these systems often come down to the type of photography you do. For event photography, documentary work, and situations where you need to shoot quickly, the 645’s simpler film handling is more practical. For studio work, portraits, and situations where you want maximum flexibility with film types, the RB67’s interchangeable back system is invaluable.
I’ve also found that the cost of film and processing is a consideration. The 645 gives you more exposures per roll, which can make it more economical for high-volume shooting. However, the RB67’s larger negatives often require less enlargement for the same final print size, which can offset some of the cost difference.
Real-World Shooting Experience
Technical specifications are important, but nothing beats real-world shooting experience when it comes to understanding how a camera performs. I’ve spent years shooting with both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 in various conditions, and I’ve learned a lot about their strengths and limitations.
Mamiya 645 in the Field
The Mamiya 645 has become my go-to camera for situations where I need a balance of image quality and portability. I’ve used it extensively for wedding photography, street photography, and travel work, and it has rarely let me down.
One of the things I appreciate most about the 645 is how quickly I can work with it. The controls are intuitive and well-placed, allowing me to make adjustments without taking my eye from the viewfinder. I’ve found that I can shoot quickly and confidently with the 645, which is crucial for capturing fleeting moments.
The camera’s relatively light weight makes it suitable for handheld shooting, and I’ve consistently produced sharp images at shutter speeds as low as 1/60th of a second. This has been invaluable for available light photography, where using a tripod isn’t always practical.
I’ve also found the 645 to be surprisingly durable. I’ve shot with it in various weather conditions and it has continued to perform reliably. The all-metal models, in particular, feel like they could withstand a lifetime of use.
Mamiya RB67 in the Field
The RB67 is a different beast altogether, and using it requires a different approach to photography. I’ve primarily used it for studio work, formal portraits, and landscape photography where I can take my time and use a tripod.
What I love about the RB67 is how it forces me to slow down and consider each frame carefully. The weight and size of the camera mean I can’t just snap away casually – each frame requires thought and preparation. I’ve found that this deliberative approach often results in stronger images, even though I shoot fewer frames.
The revolving back is a feature I’ve come to rely on heavily. Being able to switch between horizontal and vertical orientations without moving the camera has been invaluable for maintaining consistent lighting and composition in portrait sessions.
While the RB67 is primarily a studio camera, I have used it successfully in the field for landscape photography. The image quality is simply outstanding, and the large negatives capture incredible detail. However, I’ve learned to limit my RB67 field work to situations where I can use a tripod and don’t need to walk long distances.
Shooting Speed and Workflow
The difference in shooting speed between these two systems is significant. With the 645, I can work quickly and efficiently, making it suitable for fast-paced situations. I’ve shot entire weddings with just a 645 and never felt limited by the camera’s handling.
The RB67, by contrast, is much slower to work with. Each frame requires more time and attention, from composing the image to advancing the film and cocking the shutter. While this might seem like a limitation, I’ve found that it encourages a more thoughtful approach to photography.
In terms of workflow, the 645 is generally more efficient. The simpler film handling and faster operation mean I can focus more on the photography and less on the mechanics of using the camera. The RB67 requires more attention to detail and process, which can be rewarding but also more time-consuming.
Cost and Value Considerations
Let’s talk money. Both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 systems represent significant investments, and understanding the cost implications is crucial for making an informed decision. I’ve bought and sold numerous cameras from both systems over the years, and I’ve learned a lot about their relative value.
Also Read: Nikon 14-30 Vs 16-35
Mamiya 645 System Costs
The Mamiya 645 system is generally more affordable to get into than the RB67, especially if you’re starting with a basic setup. Entry-level 645 bodies can be found for $200-400, with standard lenses adding another $150-300. This makes it possible to get started with a complete 645 kit for under $1000, which is quite reasonable for medium format photography.
I’ve found that the 645 system offers good value for money. The cameras are well-built, reliable, and produce excellent images. The relatively low cost of entry makes it an attractive option for photographers who want to experience medium format without breaking the bank.
One cost advantage of the 645 system is film economy. With 15-16 exposures per 120 roll, you get more shots for your money compared to the RB67. This can add up over time, especially if you shoot frequently.
The lens system is also reasonably priced, with good quality lenses available for $200-500 on the used market. I’ve built up a comprehensive 645 lens collection over the years without spending a fortune.
Mamiya RB67 System Costs
The RB67 system is generally more expensive, both in terms of initial investment and ongoing costs. A basic RB67 setup with a standard lens will typically cost $600-1000, with additional lenses and backs adding significantly to that total.
However, I’ve found that the RB67 offers excellent value for the money when you consider the image quality and build quality. These cameras are built to last a lifetime, and many RB67 bodies from the 1970s are still going strong today. The initial investment may be higher, but the long-term value is exceptional.
One cost consideration with the RB67 is the film back system. While the ability to swap backs is incredibly useful, each additional back adds to the cost. I’ve found that having at least two backs is ideal for professional work, which means budgeting for an extra $200-400 beyond the basic camera setup.
RB67 lenses are also more expensive than their 645 counterparts, with good quality examples typically ranging from $300-800. However, the optical quality and build of these lenses justify the higher cost, and they tend to hold their value well over time.
Long-Term Value and Resale
Both systems hold their value reasonably well, but I’ve found that RB67 equipment tends to appreciate more over time. The legendary status of the RB67 system means that good quality examples often sell for more than their original purchase price, especially if they’re well-maintained.
The 645 system also holds its value well, though not as dramatically as the RB67. However, the lower initial cost means that the percentage return on investment can still be quite good.
I’ve learned that condition is crucial when buying used medium format equipment. Well-maintained examples of both systems command premium prices, but they’re also more likely to provide reliable service. I always recommend buying from reputable dealers or experienced photographers who can provide accurate condition reports.
Which Camera is Right for You?
After all this detailed comparison, you’re probably wondering which camera you should choose. The truth is, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer – the right choice depends on your specific needs, shooting style, and budget. Let me help you think through this decision based on different scenarios.
Choose the Mamiya 645 If:
You’re primarily a handheld photographer who values portability and shooting speed. I’ve found the 645 to be ideal for wedding photographers, photojournalists, and street photographers who need to work quickly and discreetly.
You’re coming from a 35mm background and want a smoother transition to medium format. The 645’s handling and ergonomics will feel more familiar, making the learning curve less steep.
You shoot a variety of subjects and need a versatile system that can handle everything from portraits to landscapes. The 645’s extensive lens lineup and adaptable nature make it a true all-rounder.
You’re on a tighter budget but still want excellent medium format quality. The 645 system offers great value for money and lower ongoing costs due to better film economy.
You frequently travel or shoot on location where weight and size are considerations. The 645’s relatively light weight makes it much more practical for these situations.
Choose the Mamiya RB67 If:
Ultimate image quality is your top priority and you’re willing to sacrifice portability for it. I’ve found the RB67 to be unmatched in terms of the detail and tonal range it can capture.
You primarily work in a studio environment where weight and size are less of an issue. The RB67’s modular design and revolving back make it perfect for studio portraiture and product photography.
You’re a landscape photographer who uses a tripod and values the ability to make large prints. The RB67’s large negatives provide incredible detail that really shines in landscape work.
You want the flexibility to switch between different film types mid-roll. The RB67’s interchangeable back system is invaluable for professional work where you need to offer clients both color and black and white options.
You appreciate mechanical cameras and want a system that will last a lifetime with proper maintenance. The RB67’s fully mechanical design means it doesn’t rely on electronics that can fail over time.
Consider Owning Both If:
You’re a professional photographer who needs the best of both worlds. I’ve found that having both systems allows me to choose the right tool for each job, using the RB67 for situations where ultimate quality is needed and the 645 for everything else.
You’re a serious enthusiast who wants to experience the full range of medium format photography. Owning both systems gives you a complete understanding of what medium format can offer.
You have the budget and storage space to accommodate multiple systems. While this requires a significant investment, the creative possibilities are nearly endless.
My Personal Journey with Both Systems
I want to share a bit about my personal experience with these cameras, because I think it might help you understand how they fit into real-world photography. When I first got into medium format, I started with a Mamiya 645 1000S. I was immediately impressed by the image quality compared to 35mm, and I found the camera relatively easy to learn and use.
For the first couple of years, the 645 was my only medium format camera, and it served me well for everything from portraits to landscapes. I loved the balance of quality and portability, and I found myself reaching for it more often than my 35mm cameras.
Then, I had the opportunity to buy an RB67 Pro-S at a good price, and I decided to give it a try. The first time I shot with it, I was blown away by the image quality, but I was also intimidated by its size and weight. For the first few months, I primarily used it in the studio for portrait sessions.
Over time, I learned to appreciate the RB67’s strengths and developed techniques for using it more effectively in the field. I discovered that while it’s not a camera for casual shooting, when used deliberately, it produces results that are hard to match with any other system.
These days, I own and use both systems regularly. I’ve found that they complement each other perfectly, and I choose between them based on the specific requirements of each shoot. For weddings and event photography, the 645 is my go-to camera. For studio portraits and landscape work where I can use a tripod, the RB67 is my first choice.
What I’ve learned from this journey is that there’s no single “best” camera – there’s only the best camera for each specific situation and personal preference. Both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 are exceptional systems that can produce stunning results when used properly.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
After years of shooting with both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 systems, I can confidently say that both are outstanding cameras that deserve their legendary status in the photography world. The choice between them ultimately comes down to your specific needs and preferences as a photographer.
If I had to give just one piece of advice, it would be this: don’t get too caught up in the technical specifications and pixel-peeping. Both cameras produce exceptional images that will satisfy even the most demanding photographers. Instead, think about how you actually shoot and what kind of photography you enjoy most.
For photographers who value spontaneity, portability, and versatility, the Mamiya 645 is hard to beat. It’s a camera that encourages you to shoot more and experiment freely, knowing that you have a reliable tool that won’t weigh you down.
For photographers who prioritize ultimate image quality and enjoy a more deliberate, contemplative approach to photography, the Mamiya RB67 is in a class of its own. It’s a camera that rewards patience and careful technique with images of breathtaking quality.
Whatever you choose, I encourage you to embrace the unique qualities of medium format photography. There’s something magical about shooting with these cameras that goes beyond just the technical specifications. It’s about the process, the craftsmanship, and the connection to photography’s rich history.
Remember, the best camera is the one that inspires you to get out and shoot. Both the Mamiya 645 and RB67 have that power in spades – choose the one that speaks to you, and start creating amazing images.
FAQ: Mamiya 645 vs RB67
Which camera is better for beginners?
I’d recommend the Mamiya 645 for beginners because it’s more forgiving to use and has a gentler learning curve. The lighter weight and more familiar handling make it easier to adapt to from 35mm photography.
Can I use RB67 lenses on a Mamiya 645?
While there are adapters available, I generally don’t recommend it. The lenses are designed for different systems, and you’ll lose functionality. It’s better to use lenses designed for your specific camera system.
Which system is better for wedding photography?
For wedding photography, I prefer the Mamiya 645 because it’s more portable and faster to operate. You can move around more easily and react quickly to moments, which is crucial for wedding photography.
How many shots do I get per roll with each camera?
With the Mamiya 645, you get 15-16 shots per 120 roll. With the RB67, you get 10 shots per 120 roll. The 645 gives you more economy, but the RB67 gives you larger negatives.
Which camera produces better image quality?
The RB67 generally produces better image quality due to its larger negative size, but the difference isn’t as dramatic as you might think. The 645 still produces exceptional images that are suitable for most professional applications.
Are these cameras good for digital conversion?
Both systems can be adapted for digital use with digital backs, though this is an expensive proposition. The 645 system has more digital options available, including some more affordable solutions.
How durable are these cameras?
Both cameras are extremely durable, but the RB67 is built like a tank and can withstand decades of heavy use. I’ve seen RB67 cameras from the 1970s that still work perfectly today.
Which system has better lens selection?
The Mamiya 645 has a more extensive lens selection, including autofocus options. However, the RB67 lenses are generally considered to be of higher optical quality, especially the later models.
Can I shoot handheld with both cameras?
You can shoot handheld with both, but the 645 is much more practical for handheld work. The RB67 is quite heavy and best used with a tripod for most situations.
Which camera holds its value better?
The RB67 generally holds its value better over time, with well-maintained examples often appreciating in value. However, both systems hold their value reasonably well compared to many other camera systems.
Pro Photography Tips
Before I wrap up, let me share some pro tips I’ve learned from years of shooting with both systems:
Start with one system and master it before adding another. Both the 645 and RB67 have learning curves, and trying to learn both at once can be overwhelming.
Invest in a good light meter. Both cameras benefit greatly from accurate exposure metering, and a handheld meter will give you more consistent results than built-in meters.
Learn to load film in the dark. This skill will save you from ruined rolls and make you a more confident film photographer.
Keep your equipment clean and maintained. Medium format cameras are precision instruments that perform best when properly cared for.
Join a photography community. Learning from other photographers who use these systems can accelerate your learning curve and provide valuable support.
Save This Guide for Future Reference
Medium format photography is a journey, not a destination. I hope this comprehensive comparison helps you make the right choice for your photography needs. Be sure to bookmark this guide and come back to it as you progress in your medium format journey. I update it regularly with new insights and information as I continue to shoot with both systems.
Happy shooting, and may your medium format adventures be filled with amazing images and unforgettable experiences!