Are you struggling to decide between the Canon M6 and M50 for your next photography adventure? I’ve been there, and I know how overwhelming camera comparisons can be. After spending countless hours shooting with both of these mirrorless cameras, I’m here to break down everything you need to know to make the right choice.
Quick Comparison: Canon M6 vs M50 at a Glance
| Feature | Canon M6 Mark II | Canon M50 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 32.5MP APS-C CMOS | 24.1MP APS-C CMOS |
| Processor | DIGIC 8 | DIGIC 8 |
| ISO Range | 100-25600 (expandable to 51200) | 100-25600 (expandable to 51200) |
| Viewfinder | Optional external EVF | Built-in 2.36M-dot OLED EVF |
| LCD Screen | 3.0″ 1.04M-dot tilt-angle touchscreen | 3.0″ 1.04M-dot vari-angle touchscreen |
| Autofocus | 143 points, Dual Pixel CMOS AF | 143 points, Dual Pixel CMOS AF |
| Continuous Shooting | 14 fps (raw) | 10 fps (raw) |
| Video | 4K 30p (uncropped), Full HD 120p | 4K 24p (1.6x crop), Full HD 60p |
| Battery Life | 305 shots (CIPA) | 235 shots (CIPA) |
| Weight | 408g (body only) | 390g (body only) |
| Launch Year | 2019 | 2018 |
Now, let’s dive deeper into each aspect to help you make an informed decision.
Canon M6 Vs M50 Design and Build Quality
When I first picked up both cameras, I immediately noticed the difference in their design philosophy. The Canon M6 Mark II has a more compact, rangefinder-style body that reminds me of classic film cameras. It’s sleek and minimalistic, but I found that the grip is a bit small for my larger hands during extended shooting sessions.
The M50, on the other hand, features a more traditional DSLR-style design with a pronounced grip and a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF). I discovered that this design is more comfortable for longer shooting periods, especially when using heavier lenses.
In terms of build quality, both cameras feel solid despite their plastic construction. Neither has extensive weather sealing, so I wouldn’t recommend either for heavy rain or extreme conditions. The M50 is slightly lighter at 390g compared to the M6’s 408g, but the difference is negligible in real-world use.
One design aspect I particularly appreciate about the M6 is its dedicated exposure compensation dial. As someone who came from shooting with manual film cameras, I find this dial intuitive and quick to access. The M50 requires you to adjust exposure compensation through the rear dial or touchscreen, which isn’t quite as immediate.
Canon M6 Vs M50 Viewfinder and Display
This is where the two cameras diverge significantly. The Canon M50 comes with a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36 million dots. I found it reasonably bright and detailed, though not on par with more expensive models. During my outdoor shoots in bright sunlight, having this built-in EVF was a game-changer.
The M6 Mark II, however, lacks a built-in viewfinder. Instead, Canon offers an optional external EVF that connects via the hot shoe. While this add-on EVF is actually higher quality than the M50’s built-in unit, it adds to the cost and makes the camera bulkier. I found myself shooting mostly with the LCD screen on the M6, which brings me to the displays…
Both cameras feature 3.0-inch touchscreen LCDs with 1.04 million dots. The M50 has a fully articulating screen that flips out to the side, which I found fantastic for vlogging and shooting from awkward angles. The M6 has a tilt-angle screen that only flips up and down, which I prefer for still photography as it keeps the screen centered with the lens axis.
The touch functionality on both cameras is excellent. I discovered that Canon’s touchscreen implementation is among the best in the industry, with intuitive controls for focusing, navigating menus, and even adjusting settings. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned photographer, you’ll appreciate how responsive and useful these touchscreens are.
Also Read: Mamiya 645 vs RB67
Image Sensor and Processor
The Canon M6 Mark II boasts a 32.5-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, significantly higher than the M50’s 24.1-megapixel sensor. Both use the DIGIC 8 image processor, which is capable and efficient.
In my testing, I found that the M6’s higher resolution sensor delivers incredible detail, especially when shooting landscapes or studio portraits where you can leverage the extra pixels. When I printed large photos from the M6, the sharpness and clarity were impressive.
However, I discovered that the M50’s lower resolution sensor actually has an advantage in low-light situations. With larger individual pixels, it produces slightly cleaner images at higher ISO settings. During my night photography sessions, I noticed less noise in the M50’s images compared to the M6 when shooting at ISO 6400 and above.
Both cameras offer an ISO range of 100-25600, expandable to 51200. In real-world use, I found that both produce usable images up to ISO 3200, with the M50 having a slight edge beyond that point.
Dynamic range is similar on both cameras, with approximately 13 stops at base ISO. I was able to recover significant shadow and highlight detail in RAW files from both cameras during my post-processing workflow.
Autofocus System
Both the Canon M6 Mark II and M50 feature Canon’s excellent Dual Pixel CMOS AF system with 143 autofocus points. This technology uses phase-detection autofocus across approximately 88% of the frame horizontally and 100% vertically.
In my experience, the autofocus performance is nearly identical in good lighting conditions. Both cameras lock onto subjects quickly and accurately, whether you’re shooting stills or video. I was particularly impressed with their ability to track moving subjects, making both cameras suitable for action photography.
However, I did notice a difference in low-light autofocus. The M50 seems to focus slightly faster and more reliably in dim conditions. During an indoor event with challenging lighting, the M50 rarely hunted for focus, while the M6 occasionally struggled.
Both cameras offer eye detection autofocus, which I found to be quite effective for portrait photography. When shooting portraits of my friends and family, both cameras consistently detected and focused on the subject’s eyes, resulting in sharp, flattering images.
The M6 Mark II does have one autofocus advantage: its continuous shooting speed. At 14 frames per second with autofocus tracking, it outperforms the M50’s 10 fps. This makes the M6 slightly better for fast-action sports or wildlife photography where capturing the perfect moment is crucial.
Continuous Shooting
As I mentioned, the Canon M6 Mark II has a faster continuous shooting rate at 14 fps compared to the M50’s 10 fps. But there’s more to the story than just the numbers.
During my testing, I found that the M50 can maintain its 10 fps shooting speed for longer bursts before the buffer fills up. When shooting a soccer game, I was able to capture longer sequences with the M50 without slowdown.
The M6, while faster initially, has a smaller buffer and slows down more quickly when shooting RAW files. I discovered that for continuous shooting in RAW+JPEG mode, the M50 is actually more practical for extended action sequences.
That said, if you need the absolute fastest burst rate for very short sequences (like a bird taking flight), the M6’s 14 fps capability gives you a better chance of capturing that decisive moment.
Both cameras offer silent shooting modes using their electronic shutters, which I found invaluable for wildlife photography and events where shutter noise would be distracting.
Video Capabilities
This is another area where these two cameras differ significantly. The Canon M6 Mark II offers superior video specifications, making it the better choice for serious videographers.
The M6 can shoot 4K video at 30p without a crop, which is fantastic for wide-angle shots. I discovered that the 4K quality is excellent, with plenty of detail and good dynamic range. Additionally, it offers Full HD recording at up to 120p for smooth slow-motion footage.
The M50, while capable of 4K recording, has some limitations. It can only shoot 4K at 24p with a significant 1.6x crop factor. This crop effectively turns a 24mm lens into a 38mm lens, making it challenging to get wide-angle shots in 4K. The M50 is also limited to 60p in Full HD, lacking the 120p slow-motion option of the M6.
Both cameras feature microphone inputs, which I found essential for getting good audio quality. I was disappointed that neither offers headphone output for monitoring audio levels while recording, a limitation of their price point.
For vloggers, the M50’s fully articulating screen makes it easier to frame yourself while recording. However, the M6’s uncropped 4K and better slow-motion capabilities might be more important for content creators who prioritize video quality over convenience.
Battery Life
Battery life is always a concern when shooting mirrorless cameras, and both the M6 and M50 have relatively modest battery life by today’s standards.
According to CIPA ratings, the M6 Mark II can capture approximately 305 shots per charge, while the M50 is rated for about 235 shots. In my real-world testing, I found these numbers to be fairly accurate, though your mileage may vary depending on your shooting style.
I discovered that using the electronic viewfinder (on the M50 or with the optional EVF on the M6) drains the battery faster than using the LCD screen. Similarly, shooting video, using continuous autofocus, and connecting to Wi-Fi all significantly reduce battery life.
Both cameras use the same LP-E17 battery, which is convenient if you already own other Canon cameras that use this battery type. I recommend carrying at least one spare battery, regardless of which camera you choose.
Neither camera supports USB charging, which is disappointing in this day and age. You’ll need to charge the batteries in the provided charger, so planning ahead is essential for all-day shooting sessions.
Lens Ecosystem
Both the Canon M6 Mark II and M50 use Canon’s EF-M mount, which was specifically designed for their mirrorless system. While the EF-M lens lineup isn’t as extensive as Canon’s EF or RF mounts, it covers all the essential focal lengths.
I’ve found that the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM is an excellent compact prime that’s perfect for everyday photography. The EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM is a fantastic ultra-wide zoom, and the EF-M 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM is a versatile all-in-one travel lens.
One advantage of both cameras is their compatibility with Canon EF and EF-S lenses using the optional EF-EOS M adapter. I discovered that this compatibility opens up a vast selection of lenses, making either camera much more versatile. Autofocus performance with adapted lenses is surprisingly good, though slightly slower than with native EF-M lenses.
For portrait photography, I highly recommend the EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM, which delivers beautiful bokeh and sharpness. For vloggers and content creators, the EF-M 11-22mm is excellent for getting wide shots in tight spaces.
User Interface and Experience
Both cameras feature Canon’s intuitive menu system, which I’ve always found to be one of the best in the industry. The menus are logically organized and easy to navigate, especially with the touchscreen interface.
The M6 Mark II has a more advanced control layout, with dedicated dials for exposure compensation and shooting modes. I found this setup to be more efficient for experienced photographers who like to change settings quickly without diving into menus.
The M50, with its simpler control layout, might be more approachable for beginners. The mode dial includes scene modes and creative assist features that help new photographers learn about exposure settings.
Both cameras offer Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity for transferring images to your smartphone. I found Canon’s Camera Connect app to be reliable and easy to use, though transferring large RAW files can be slow.
One feature I particularly appreciate on both cameras is the ability to customize the “My Menu” tab. I set this up with my most frequently used settings, which saves me time during shoots.
Who Should Buy Which Camera In 2025?
After extensive testing with both cameras, I’ve developed clear recommendations based on different user needs:
Also Read: Canon SL2 vs SL3
The Canon M6 Mark II is ideal for:
- Photographers who prioritize image quality: The 32.5MP sensor delivers incredible detail that’s especially noticeable in large prints or heavy cropping.
- Action and sports photographers: The 14 fps continuous shooting gives you a better chance of capturing fast-moving subjects.
- Serious videographers: Uncropped 4K at 30p and 1080p at 120p make it the more capable video camera.
- Experienced photographers: The advanced control layout and customization options will appeal to those who like to take full control of their settings.
- Street photographers: The compact, rangefinder-style design is less conspicuous and easier to carry for long periods.
The Canon M50 is ideal for:
- Beginners and family photographers: The simpler interface, built-in EVF, and guided modes make it more approachable.
- Vloggers and content creators: The fully articulating screen is perfect for framing yourself while recording.
- Travel photographers: The built-in EVF eliminates the need to carry an accessory, saving space in your bag.
- Budget-conscious buyers: The M50 is typically less expensive than the M6 Mark II, making it a better value proposition.
- Low-light photographers: The slightly better high ISO performance gives it an edge in challenging lighting conditions.
Pro Photography Tips for Both Cameras
Regardless of which camera you choose, here are some tips I’ve discovered to get the most out of it:
- Use Dual Pixel AF to its fullest: Both cameras have excellent autofocus systems. Take advantage of the touch-and-drag AF feature to select your focus point quickly.
- Shoot in RAW+JPEG: This gives you the flexibility of RAW files for editing while providing ready-to-share JPEGs. The M6’s high-resolution RAW files are particularly impressive when processed properly.
- Customize your buttons: Both cameras allow you to customize button functions. I set the M6’s record button to initiate back-button focus, which I find more reliable than half-pressing the shutter.
- Invest in good lenses: The kit lenses that come with these cameras are decent, but upgrading to better glass will dramatically improve your image quality. The EF-M 32mm f/1.4 is my personal favorite for both cameras.
- Use the electronic first curtain: In the menu, enable electronic first curtain shutter to reduce shutter shock and get sharper images at slower shutter speeds.
- Master the picture profiles: Both cameras offer various picture profiles that can be customized to your taste. I’ve created a flat profile for video that gives me more flexibility in post-processing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Canon M6 Mark II better than the M50?
The M6 Mark II excels in resolution, continuous shooting speed, and video capabilities, making it technically superior in many aspects. However, “better” depends on your needs. The M50’s built-in EVF, fully articulating screen, and lower price make it the better choice for many users, especially beginners and vloggers.
Does the Canon M6 have a viewfinder?
The Canon M6 Mark II does not have a built-in viewfinder. However, Canon offers an optional external electronic viewfinder (EVF-DC1 or EVF-DC2) that attaches to the hot shoe. This accessory adds to the cost and size of the camera but provides a high-quality viewing experience.
Can the Canon M50 shoot 4K without crop?
No, the Canon M50 has a significant 1.6x crop factor when shooting 4K video. This means a 24mm lens will effectively become a 38mm lens in 4K mode. The M6 Mark II, on the other hand, can shoot 4K without any crop, making it better for wide-angle video work.
Which camera has better battery life?
The Canon M6 Mark II has better battery life, rated for approximately 305 shots per charge compared to the M50’s 235 shots. In real-world use, I found the difference to be noticeable, especially during long shooting days. Both cameras use the same LP-E17 battery, so carrying spares is recommended regardless of which model you choose.
Are EF-M lenses being discontinued?
Canon has shifted focus to their RF mount for their newer mirrorless cameras, leading to speculation about the future of the EF-M system. However, Canon has not officially discontinued EF-M lenses, and existing lenses remain available. The EF-M system still offers a solid selection of lenses for most photography needs, and both cameras are compatible with EF and EF-S lenses using an adapter.
Final Thoughts
After extensively testing both the Canon M6 Mark II and M50, I can confidently say that both are excellent mirrorless cameras that serve different audiences. The M6 Mark II is the more technically advanced camera with its higher resolution sensor, faster continuous shooting, and better video capabilities. It’s ideal for photographers who prioritize image quality and advanced features.
The M50, while not as technically impressive, offers a more complete package with its built-in EVF, fully articulating screen, and more beginner-friendly interface. It’s the camera I’d recommend to most people starting their photography journey or those primarily interested in vlogging.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and photography style. I hope this detailed comparison has helped you make an informed decision. Whichever camera you choose, both are capable of producing stunning images that will satisfy most photographers.
Don’t forget to bookmark this page for future reference, as I’ll be updating it with any new information or firmware updates that might affect these cameras. Happy shooting!